Taxpayers funding mice 'humanized' by aborted babies?

Saturday, March 9, 2019
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

baby feetThe federal government is continuing to fund research on humanized mice – in spite of opposition from the Trump administration – and one pro-life activist explained the underlying reason why the controversial tax-funded experimentation persists.

The United States Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has extended a 90-day contract for research at the University of California- San Francisco – to the dismay of many pro-life advocates.

The taxpayer funds will purchase tissue from aborted babies and implant them in mice brains to develop humanized mice.

Joe Langfeld of the Human Life Alliance indicated that to understand the reason for the grant, one must follow the paper trail back to the researchers.

“Millions and hundreds and tens of hundreds of millions of dollars [are] driving a culture of death – causing science and other researchers to look for the easy way out … instead of finding the best and most healthy way without abusing a right to life,” Langfeld stressed.

The pro-life activist contended that aborted baby tissue is not needed to conduct the research.

“I can tell you that when they were doing the research at Harvard on the stem cell lines from the fetal cell lines, every time they would inject the mice that they experiment on, those cells always – 100 percent of the times – ended up going out of control,” Langfeld shared. “We call that cancerous. That does not happen with adult and cord blood cells.”

An explanation of why the government actually funds the research was then given.

It was noted that the last time the U.S. Senate voted for a budget bill was several years ago. Accordingly, when a continuing resolution is passed, it is essentially continuing that particular budget measure, which does fund the research – and Planned Parenthood, as well.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

I agree with this HHS proposal reversing the Obamacare section benefiting transgenders primarily because …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Missouri governor signs bill banning abortions at 8 weeks
Feds move to correct Obama's transgender healthcare policies
Trump calls for declassification of Mueller probe documents
Jury finds man guilty of murder in Tennessee church shooting
UK's May says she'll quit as Conservative leader June 7
Kenyan court upholds laws against homosexual relations

LATEST FROM THE WEB

The 4 fears used to manipulate Americans
We don't have a problem with white supremacy. We have a problem with leftist supremacy
Portland State rejects ‘Conservative Political Thought’ course because it’s not inclusive
The problem with ‘price transparency’ in prescription drugs
Feminism: False advertising at its finest

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Technology can't replace doc at bedside

elderly patientTechnology has a rightful place in medicine but it cannot and should not replace the heart of a caring doctor, says a longtime physician.