CRISPR implications less than crystal clear

Thursday, November 29, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

DNA strandWhat some people might consider a new era of medicine, others deem unethical.

A Chinese scientist is making headlines after he reportedly used CRISPR to make the first genetically edited babies. CRISPR stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats.

"It's a blockbuster development that has been predicted for some time that scientists somewhere in the world would sooner or later use this gene editing technique to genetically alter babies at the embryonic stage," explains Clarke Forsythe of Americans United for Life (AUL). "It's unethical, and it breaches understood ethical prohibitions, ethical moratorium on such research because it's basically experimenting on the embryos and not therapeutic."

Forsythe thinks everyone needs to be informed about the nature of what is going on here and how it differs from, say, being the first heart transplant patient.

"These children were not asked to give their consent. They were not informed. They were not adult patients who were told about the risks and potential benefits before they underwent this procedure," he submits. "Apparently the parents gave consent, but it's questionable whether they were even informed about what's going on here and what the implications are."

Forsythe

The scientist in question reportedly removed from the embryos a gene that may be a factor in HIV infection. According to Wired.com, the scientist said his trial was not just for these few patients, but for the millions of children suffering from HIV all over the world.

Wire.com tells of the scientist's personal experience with a village in China where 30 percent of the residents are infected and children have to live with their relatives for fear of contracting the virus.

Still, Forsythe questions what the implications are from removing the gene.

"Apparently some of the embryos died, possibly from the procedure," he reports. "Apparently two babies were eventually born, but what are the implications for their health?"

Forsythe adds there are other ways of protecting against HIV infection. 

"What if the gene has other life-sustaining properties or traits that these children will eventually realize as their life goes on?" he poses. "What are the implications of taking out a gene for such a purpose, when these embryos weren't babies who had an identifiable disease?"

Comments will be temporarily unavailable. Thank you for your patience as we restore this service!

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

The main lesson for the GOP to learn from Democrats defending Maxine Waters is…

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Jury reaches verdict at trial over George Floyd's death
Police: 1 killed, 2 wounded in shooting at NY grocery store
Walter Mondale, Carter's vice president, dies at 93
Search for survivors of capsized lift boat ends
Portland police make 2 arrests amid protest vandalism
Afghanistan withdrawal draws concerns over abducted American
Canada's Trudeau extends travel restrictions

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Minnesota’s Walz declares state of emergency prior to Derek Chauvin verdict
Minnesota lawmaker proposes law to strip convicted protesters of food stamps, unemployment benefits, and other gov't programs
Judge overseeing Chauvin trial blasts Waters' 'abhorrent' comments
Facebook co-founder donated millions to Black Lives Matter
Watch how media reacted to Russian bounty story

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
'Fuzzy' predictions present scary possibilities

DNA strandA new form of genetic tests is raising a serious question of ethics.