FCC deep-sixes Obama's 'heavy-handed' Internet regs

Friday, December 15, 2017
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Internet concept (http)Yesterday's vote by the FCC on Net Neutrality clearly isn't the final word on the matter, as both sides of the issue continue to debate what a "free and neutral" Internet really is.

On Thursday the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted along party lines to undo "Net Neutrality" rules put in place during the Obama administration. The stated purpose for Net Neutrality was to ensure Internet service providers (ISPs) treat all content equally; and those in favor of it argue that companies such as Netflix or Amazon pay to speed up traffic to their websites. At that time, the FCC claimed it had authority to do Net Neutrality based on Title II of the Communications Act of 1934.

hand on computer keyboardAlready Washington State is suing the current FCC for undoing Net Neutrality. Other lawsuits are expected, and not just from states or attorneys general, but special interest groups. On Capitol Hill, Senator Edward Markey (D-Massachusetts) tweeted that he planned to introduce a Congressional Review Act resolution that "would restore the Open Internet Order and reverse the FCC's historical mistake of repealing Net Neutrality."

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) supports the idea. "This is the end of the Internet as we know it," the senator said in a video posted online. "In Congress and in the courts, we must fight back."

Still, the FCC stands by its vote. "The Federal Communications Commission voted to restore the longstanding, bipartisan light-touch regulatory framework that has fostered rapid Internet growth, openness, and freedom for nearly 20 years," the agency said in a statement. "The FCC's 2015 heavy-handed, utility-style regulation of broadband Internet access service … imposed substantial costs on the entire Internet ecosystem."

In other words, today's FCC believes Net Neutrality would harm, not help, the Internet. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) agrees:

Ryan: "Despite its unassuming name, the Obama administration's net neutrality regulation threatens the free and open Internet that has done so much to advance modern society. The Trump administration's action to roll back this egregious government overreach into the most innovative space will benefit all users of the Internet. As [FCC] chairman Pai outlined today, the way to protect consumers is to put the Federal Trade Commission back on the beat to crack down on those who would abuse open access. This new plan of action will open new avenues for telemedicine, distance learning, and future innovations."

Meanwhile, Ryan Radia of the Competitive Enterprise Institute says users can still get on Facebook, surf YouTube, and even binge watch Netflix without Net Neutrality.


"I can pretty much guarantee it," he says. "If you are a consumer and you want to know what's going to happen now that Net Neutrality regulation has been taken off the book, the answer is probably nothing for the short-term. Your Internet experience is not going to change dramatically; probably not at all, in fact. It'll more or less be the same, at least for the time being."

In the longer run, Radia says consumers may see changes that are beneficial, perhaps even some arrangements involving ISPs and content companies like Netflix that Radia says could mean lower bills for Internet users.

"[I think] that's ... a little longer on the horizon maybe in a few years, rather than in the immediate term, [but] there is nothing to worry about right now," he continues. "Your ability to binge-watch over the holidays is not going to be affected by the FCC decision, no matter what you hear from left-wing activists and certain companies that have a self-interest in not having to pay for any of this infrastructure."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.



We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details




Would you prefer that Attorney General Jeff Sessions uphold the laws of the United States – or the laws of the United Methodist Church?





Trump advises GOP: Quit wasting time on immigration.
Administration seeks to expand immigrant family detention
Trump tries to change focus of border debate
Racist tropes in Ramadan TV satires anger black Arabs
Man charged in bike path killings speaks in court of 'Allah'
Lawsuits challenge efforts to push abstinence-only on teens
Nearly 400 people used Calif. assisted death law in 2017


'Ashamed' Comey weighs calling himself Canadian, rips Trump border actions during Ireland visit
Coffins at DMZ to collect US service members' remains from North Korea
Ex-teacher busted for allegedly having sex with same teen Anthony Weiner sexted
FBI agent Peter Strzok subpoenaed to testify by House Judiciary Committee
Trump shuts down federal office dictating guidelines for doctors


Cartoon of the Day


'Meaningless symbolism' cheaper at the local level

Chicago skylineWith the U.S. not participating in the Paris climate agreement, cities are taking it upon themselves to fight what they call "man-made global warming." But not everyone thinks it's necessary.