FCC deep-sixes Obama's 'heavy-handed' Internet regs

Friday, December 15, 2017
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Internet concept (http)Yesterday's vote by the FCC on Net Neutrality clearly isn't the final word on the matter, as both sides of the issue continue to debate what a "free and neutral" Internet really is.

On Thursday the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted along party lines to undo "Net Neutrality" rules put in place during the Obama administration. The stated purpose for Net Neutrality was to ensure Internet service providers (ISPs) treat all content equally; and those in favor of it argue that companies such as Netflix or Amazon pay to speed up traffic to their websites. At that time, the FCC claimed it had authority to do Net Neutrality based on Title II of the Communications Act of 1934.

hand on computer keyboardAlready Washington State is suing the current FCC for undoing Net Neutrality. Other lawsuits are expected, and not just from states or attorneys general, but special interest groups. On Capitol Hill, Senator Edward Markey (D-Massachusetts) tweeted that he planned to introduce a Congressional Review Act resolution that "would restore the Open Internet Order and reverse the FCC's historical mistake of repealing Net Neutrality."

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) supports the idea. "This is the end of the Internet as we know it," the senator said in a video posted online. "In Congress and in the courts, we must fight back."

Still, the FCC stands by its vote. "The Federal Communications Commission voted to restore the longstanding, bipartisan light-touch regulatory framework that has fostered rapid Internet growth, openness, and freedom for nearly 20 years," the agency said in a statement. "The FCC's 2015 heavy-handed, utility-style regulation of broadband Internet access service … imposed substantial costs on the entire Internet ecosystem."

In other words, today's FCC believes Net Neutrality would harm, not help, the Internet. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin) agrees:

Ryan: "Despite its unassuming name, the Obama administration's net neutrality regulation threatens the free and open Internet that has done so much to advance modern society. The Trump administration's action to roll back this egregious government overreach into the most innovative space will benefit all users of the Internet. As [FCC] chairman Pai outlined today, the way to protect consumers is to put the Federal Trade Commission back on the beat to crack down on those who would abuse open access. This new plan of action will open new avenues for telemedicine, distance learning, and future innovations."

Meanwhile, Ryan Radia of the Competitive Enterprise Institute says users can still get on Facebook, surf YouTube, and even binge watch Netflix without Net Neutrality.

Radia

"I can pretty much guarantee it," he says. "If you are a consumer and you want to know what's going to happen now that Net Neutrality regulation has been taken off the book, the answer is probably nothing for the short-term. Your Internet experience is not going to change dramatically; probably not at all, in fact. It'll more or less be the same, at least for the time being."

In the longer run, Radia says consumers may see changes that are beneficial, perhaps even some arrangements involving ISPs and content companies like Netflix that Radia says could mean lower bills for Internet users.

"[I think] that's ... a little longer on the horizon maybe in a few years, rather than in the immediate term, [but] there is nothing to worry about right now," he continues. "Your ability to binge-watch over the holidays is not going to be affected by the FCC decision, no matter what you hear from left-wing activists and certain companies that have a self-interest in not having to pay for any of this infrastructure."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

I agree with this HHS proposal reversing the Obamacare section benefiting transgenders primarily because …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

‘We’re trapped’: Likely tornado rips through Oklahoma town
Iraq offers to mediate in crisis between its allies Iran, US
Venezuela negotiators return to Norway for crisis talks
Mike Pence: West Point grads should expect to see combat
Flooding leads to Oklahoma and Arkansas evacuations
New candidates vie to succeed UK’s May with focus on Brexit
Bolton says N. Korea missile tests violated UN resolutions

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Tornado strikes El Reno, Oklahoma; at least 2 deaths confirmed: reports
Thousands march in Hong Kong to commemorate June 4 protests
Israelis protest moves to grant Netanyahu immunity, limit Supreme Court
Video: Judge blocks part of Trump's border wall plan
Beto echoes Iranian propaganda, says Trump 'provoking another war' with troop increase

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
'Meaningless symbolism' cheaper at the local level

Chicago skylineWith the U.S. not participating in the Paris climate agreement, cities are taking it upon themselves to fight what they call "man-made global warming." But not everyone thinks it's necessary.