California's meaningless 'game-changer'

Monday, June 19, 2017
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

solar, geothermal power plantThe U.S. may have exited from the Paris climate agreement, but that's not stopping California from pursuing what critics call a symbolic, feel-good effort with renewable energy.

Governor Jerry Brown (D-CA) and others want California to get 50 percent of its electricity from renewable sources by the year 2030.

"What has been the source of our prosperity now becomes the source of our ultimate destruction, if we don't get off it," Brown said at a 2015 signing ceremony in Los Angeles.

Environmental groups applaud California's goal. That includes the National Resources Defense Council, which has called this a game-changer.

Norman Rogers of ClimateViews.com is not in that camp. He thinks California is setting the nation's worst example for a renewable energy marketplace.

"First of all, they're raising the price of electricity for all the people in California," Rogers tells OneNewsNow. "Second of all, it's really not practical to get 50 percent of your energy where a lot of wind power and solar power is involved, because it's too erratic."

Faced with this shortfall, Rogers says California is buying power from other states and using electricity from natural gas.

"Renewable power providers in California sell renewable power certificates (RPCs) to the state so California can pretend that they are providing renewable energy to all, even though wind turbines in Palm Springs are not powering office buildings in San Diego," he explains.

Hypothetically, if California were to achieve its goal, or even get close to 50 percent, does that mean it is that more environmentally friendly? Solar panels and wind turbines contain things that have to be mined, manufactured, transported, etc., and all those methods have an impact on the environment.

"It's not so much that, but it's just a total waste of money," answers Rogers. "If you even believe the theory there is going to be a global warming disaster from putting carbon dioxide in the air, that's on very shaky ground as far as science goes, because the earth hasn't really warmed in the last two decades."

Meanwhile, Rogers says China is still burning a lot more coal than the U.S. 

"So this whole action by California is purely a feel good, symbolic thing. It has no meaning whatsoever in the real world," he concludes.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What is your worst suspicion of the U.S. Senate's health care bill? (Choose all that apply)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump admits there are no Comey tapes
GOP's challenge: finding votes for Senate health care bill
Supreme Court could reveal action on travel ban at any time
Detroit judge halts deportation of Iraqi Christians
  Pence visits Focus on Family amid change for religious right

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Ferguson's Michael Brown to get Hollywood treatment
University of Georgia socialist group calls for GOP lawmakers to be 'guillotined'
Would baseball team have mocked Tebow’s religion had he been a Muslim?
Johnny Depp skates on kill Trump joke — unlike Obama clown
College prep seminar asks high schoolers to identify their privileges

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Wildlife conservation putting humans at greater risk

sharkIt's understood in science that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. That applies to government efforts at protecting wildlife, which in turn seems to be putting human life in greater danger from wild animals.