Reporter fired for questioning climate change

Wednesday, February 15, 2017
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

hot temperaturesClimate change skeptics say they're not surprised at claims that a climate reporter was fired for questioning the science behind climate change.

Mish Michaels was working as a science reporter for the "Greater Boston" program on WGBH, but the Boston Globe reports she was let go after having "questioned the evidence that human activity was causing global warming."

Dr. Pat Michaels, a climatologist for the Cato Institute, calls it shameful it she was terminated for her analysis of climate change.

"Because the folks at WGBH could actually really do their listeners a service," says Michaels, "by having a science reporter who could dig into the climate model forecast versus what's happening. And they would discover it's not very much like it's supposed to be. It's supposed to be warming up much faster than it is."

If you take a look at the latest monthly climate record from the University of East Anglia, Michaels says it appears very much like we're going back into a pause.

Marc Morano of Climate Depot alleges this is a concerted effort that's been going on for years.

"American Meteorological Society has been trying to sort of rein in their skeptical members," he says, "and this is one of the paradoxes you get."

There is a claim of 97-percent consensus among scientific organizations, says Morano, but talking to rank-and-file scientists shows that many of them remain skeptical that mankind is causing the earth to warm.

OneNewsNow was unable to reach Mish Michaels for comment.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

I agree with this HHS proposal reversing the Obamacare section benefiting transgenders primarily because …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Missouri governor signs bill banning abortions at 8 weeks
Feds move to correct Obama's transgender healthcare policies
Trump calls for declassification of Mueller probe documents
Jury finds man guilty of murder in Tennessee church shooting
UK's May says she'll quit as Conservative leader June 7
Kenyan court upholds laws against homosexual relations

LATEST FROM THE WEB

The 4 fears used to manipulate Americans
We don't have a problem with white supremacy. We have a problem with leftist supremacy
Portland State rejects ‘Conservative Political Thought’ course because it’s not inclusive
The problem with ‘price transparency’ in prescription drugs
Feminism: False advertising at its finest

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Positives to the pipelines

TransCanada Keystone XLThere may be an environmental benefit to the Dakota Access and Keystone XL pipelines.