Wind energy is for the birds ... or is it?

Friday, May 6, 2016
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

eagle near wind turbineThe same government that wants to protect the earth and animals is okay with thousands of eagles dying.

The Obama administration is revising a federal rule allowing wind-energy companies to operate high-speed turbines for up to 30 years, even if it means killing or injuring thousands of federally protected bald and golden eagles.

As explained by The Associated Press, wind companies and other power providers could kill or injure up to 4,200 bald eagles a year without penalty. That's nearly four times the current limit.

"I'm not an expert on eagle populations [but] it seems a bit incongruous that we're having what is supposed to be an environmentally beneficial energy source that is killing so many of these rare birds," says Dr. David Kreutzer, senior research fellow in energy economics and climate change for The Heritage Foundation.

Kreutzer, Dr. David (Heritage)"I'm suspicious that other energy projects wouldn't get the same favorable treatment, [as] they certainly don't get the same favorable treatment for access to capital and loan guarantees; and they don't seem to be getting the same favorable treatment when it comes to killing golden and bald eagles."

According to Fish and Wildlife Director Dan Ashe, the proposal will "provide a path forward" for maintaining eagle populations, while also spurring development of a pollution-free energy source that's intended to ease global warming.

Still, efforts are under way by the Interior Department to protect sage grouse populations, efforts that energy and mining companies say hamper production of resources. Then there's the ongoing situation involving the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), an area where government officials want no production of energy whatsoever, the concern being that it may threaten wildlife.

"If you try to say everything the government does should make sense with everything else it does, you'll go insane yourself trying to square that," says Kreutzer.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

When another state legislature introduces a bill protecting all-female sports, it means…(Choose up to two)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Students abducted from Nigerian school 2 weeks ago freed
  Virginia lawmakers vote to legalize marijuana in 2024
  Justice Dept. to appeal judge’s order on eviction moratorium
House Dems ram through massive pandemic bill in wee hours
Trump the dominant force at conservative conference
Judge approves $650M Facebook privacy lawsuit settlement

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Roger Stone, at CPAC, says he'd back Trump in 2024 but warns Dems, media will try to 'bury' accomplishments
Biden sees ‘no time to waste,’ urges senate to pass $1.9 trillion COVID-19 stimulus package
2nd former aide accuses Cuomo of sexual harassment
Pompeo to CPAC: Trump administration 'bold And fearless' defenders
Grenell: 'Outside viewpoint' essential to government

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Net neutrality not as 'neutral' as portrayed

man using computer in dark roomAnother day and still no net neutrality for the Internet, although not everyone thinks it's necessary.