Wind energy is for the birds ... or is it?

Friday, May 6, 2016
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

eagle near wind turbineThe same government that wants to protect the earth and animals is okay with thousands of eagles dying.

The Obama administration is revising a federal rule allowing wind-energy companies to operate high-speed turbines for up to 30 years, even if it means killing or injuring thousands of federally protected bald and golden eagles.

As explained by The Associated Press, wind companies and other power providers could kill or injure up to 4,200 bald eagles a year without penalty. That's nearly four times the current limit.

"I'm not an expert on eagle populations [but] it seems a bit incongruous that we're having what is supposed to be an environmentally beneficial energy source that is killing so many of these rare birds," says Dr. David Kreutzer, senior research fellow in energy economics and climate change for The Heritage Foundation.

Kreutzer, Dr. David (Heritage)"I'm suspicious that other energy projects wouldn't get the same favorable treatment, [as] they certainly don't get the same favorable treatment for access to capital and loan guarantees; and they don't seem to be getting the same favorable treatment when it comes to killing golden and bald eagles."

According to Fish and Wildlife Director Dan Ashe, the proposal will "provide a path forward" for maintaining eagle populations, while also spurring development of a pollution-free energy source that's intended to ease global warming.

Still, efforts are under way by the Interior Department to protect sage grouse populations, efforts that energy and mining companies say hamper production of resources. Then there's the ongoing situation involving the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), an area where government officials want no production of energy whatsoever, the concern being that it may threaten wildlife.

"If you try to say everything the government does should make sense with everything else it does, you'll go insane yourself trying to square that," says Kreutzer.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

It appears Democrats view healthcare as the major issue for the 2020 election – do you agree?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Iran dismisses US allegation it was behind Saudi oil attacks
Police: Owner blew up house on his daughter's wedding day
Cleanup resumes in Bahamas as Humberto swirls away
Several injured when decks collapse during firefighter event
Trump backs a Netanyahu priority ahead of Israeli election
White House says bin Laden son killed in US operation
In Alaska hometown, Native women say police ignored rapes
Skirmishes break out in Hong Kong mall amid counter rallies

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Defiant Iran blasts Pompeo’s Saudi-attack accusations as ‘blind and futile comments’
John Bolton resigned after President Trump suggested going easy on Iran, report says
NY Times sparks furor with tweet describing alleged Kavanaugh behavior as 'harmless fun'
Pompeo accuses Iran of 'unprecedented attack' after drones hit Saudi oil facilities
Trump, Saudi Crown Prince speak on refinery attack, SPA says

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Net neutrality not as 'neutral' as portrayed

man using computer in dark roomAnother day and still no net neutrality for the Internet, although not everyone thinks it's necessary.