Exaggeration continues to fuel climate-change agenda

Tuesday, December 15, 2015
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Paris 2015 climate change conferenceVarious governments may have agreed on what they're calling a new climate "agreement," but the debate is far from over.

The Paris agreement adopted on December 12 aims to prevent what some are calling "man-made global warming" from rising another 1.8 degrees (Fahrenheit) between now and the end of the century. Some religious leaders are applauding the move, as are President Obama and members of his administration.

"It will help the world prepare for the impacts of climate change that are already here, and also for those we know are now headed our way inevitably," said Secretary of State John Kerry.

The argument from the Obama administration and others is that man's burning of fossil fuels is resulting in heat-trapping emissions that warm temperatures and make for bigger, more powerful storms.

Regardless, the agreement in Paris is being criticized for not having any enforcement sanctions or mechanisms, something Kerry defended on Fox News Sunday. "If there had been a penalty, we would not have been able to get an agreement," he stated.

John Kerry (sec'y of state)Kerry also acknowledged that the agreement will not "get us to the final level," but points out that countries did agree to reduce their emissions: "The curve of emissions is beginning to come down. If we can stay on track, we have a chance to avoid the worst damage of climate change."

Paul Driessen with the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) sees a bit of silver lining in all of this.

"It's a victory for all of us, I guess, in the sense that it's voluntary; it's not obligatory for anybody," he notes. "But I think a lot of the language that has been used to characterize this is just incredibly misleading. And as a lot of scientists point out, the effect on climate change is greatly exaggerated."

Craig D. Idso, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute and founder and chairman of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide, writes: "The people behind the Paris climate negotiations care little for the truth, little for fossil fuels, little for affordable energy and little for the millions of unfortunate people who will suffer the negative consequences of their misguided plans to eliminate carbon-based energy."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Just once, I'd like to see the secular media …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Curfews ordered in more than dozen US cities
Protests heat up across US, governors call in National Guard
FBI says its top lawyer is leaving the bureau
‘Back in the game’: SpaceX ship blasts off with 2 astronauts
National Guard summoned to aid cities amid police clashes
Pentagon puts military police on alert to go to Minneapolis
What’s behind latest India-China border tension

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump says will not allow mob violence to rule
Knife-wielding woman shot and killed by police, days after her brother was arrested for ISIS terror plot
Opinion — Andrew McCarthy: Laws against rioting and terrorism must be enforced against Antifa and other violent radicals
Supreme Court rejects challenge to limits on church services; Roberts sides with liberals
In unusual move, US embassies in Africa speak up on Floyd

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Critic: Nothing but hot air out of Paris

climate change global warming 620x300When it comes to countries agreeing in Paris to reduce their emissions, some Christians are celebrating. Others, however, call it a "total waste."