Expectations low re: Paris climate talks

Tuesday, December 1, 2015
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Paris 2015 climate change conferenceBarack Obama and other world leaders have traveled to Paris this week to talk about what they can do to combat alleged "climate change" – but in doing so they may also be contributing to the "problem" they are trying to ease.

The argument behind climate change (a.k.a. "global warming") is that man's burning of fossil fuels is driving the problem by putting more heat-trapping emissions in the atmosphere, reportedly resulting in warmer temperatures and bigger, more powerful storms.

"The United States of America not only recognizes our role in creating this problem, we embrace our responsibility to do something about it," the president told his audience at COP 21 in Paris.

Dr. Patrick Michaels, a past president of the American Association of State Climatologists, now works for the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute. He doesn't think the talks in the French capital will accomplish much.


"If you take the temperature trajectories the United Nations says the world would be on, if we basically did nothing about climate change, after these meetings are done we're going to be pretty much on the same trajectories," he summarizes.

In the meantime, Michaels warns that while most other countries aren't going to really do anything, Obama's proposed policies are much more stringent.

"The United States ... is proposing to reduce its emissions considerably beyond what is called a 'business-as-usual' scenario," he begins. "And in fact, because the [president's] Clean Power Plan says we can't achieve that by substituting natural gas for coal in electrical generation, it's going to be very expensive – and frankly, I don't think we can do that anyway. It's not going to be very popular."

Various individuals, think tanks, and special-interest groups are skeptical of the "fossil fuels" argument as well as what they call inaccurate climate models warning of catastrophe.

Hypocritical - but having fun

Meanwhile, Townhall reported yesterday on President Obama's travel to Paris, for which he used "fossil-fuel powered Air Force One" to reach his destination. While some may write that off as a partisan attack, the fact that world leaders have been flying worldwide for years to warn about emissions has been a point of concern for climate scientists. At least one of those scientists has told OneNewsNow that "there is definitely a big discussion in our community regarding the carbon footprint of our travel."

David Kreutzer, PhD, a research fellow in energy economics and climate change at The Heritage Foundation, hesitates to criticize world leaders for their mode of travel because, as he says, "they have security problems that the rest of us don't have."

Kreutzer, Dr. David (Heritage)"But the hypocrisy extends way beyond the presidents and prime ministers and so on," he continues. "You have Hollywood people flying in private jets to protest energy use. I wonder why they don't use the technology that we have. This would be the perfect thing for a massive teleconference, where you could broadcast all the hearings and people could be connected electronically."

And while Kreutzer acknowledges that it would take work to go that route, he says it can be done.

"I think the reason we don't see that is because it's a lot more fun to go to Bali and to go to Paris and to go to Copenhagen than to sit in your office, wherever it is you are, and look at a screen, getting maybe even more work done – but without the fun," he states. "If you took the fun out of this, they would be on to some other issue."

Meanwhile, Kreutzer counters arguments from Obama and others that weather is becoming more extreme because of climate change or global warming. He tells OneNewsNow there has been no increase in occurrences like tornados, hurricanes, floods, and droughts.


We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details





If I had to choose one thing I like about the just-passed 'pandemic relief' bill, it would be …





‘Choppy waters’ await Navy as virus strikes aircraft carrier
In Iran, false belief a poison fights virus kills hundreds
Virus prevention measures turn violent in parts of Africa
US eyes new outbreaks as infections worldwide top 590,000
States impose new restrictions on travelers from New York
No games, big losses: Money crisis faces US Olympic sports
Trump seeks to force General Motors to produce ventilators


Coronavirus kills one person every 17 minutes in New York
Video: Tony Perkins responds to New York Times op-ed that blames Christians for spread of coronavirus
National Rifle Association blasts L.A. County Sheriff's 'reckless decision' to close down gun shops
Trump defends trip to Va. to see off Navy hospital ship, says he won't be 'jumping around in a huddle'
Hillary Clinton makes joke out of coronavirus: Trump did promise 'America first'


Cartoon of the Day
Critic: Nothing but hot air out of Paris

climate change global warming 620x300When it comes to countries agreeing in Paris to reduce their emissions, some Christians are celebrating. Others, however, call it a "total waste."