'Death with dignity' push gaining ground in MA

Tuesday, June 25, 2019
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

elderly patientLawmakers in Massachusetts are debating today about doctor-assisted suicide.

Today's discussion will take place in the Joint Committee on Public Health, where advocates for the proposal call it “death with dignity” but Andrew Beckwith of Massachusetts Family Institute says the method is still assisted suicide.

“They've been after this for years,” he advises. “They took it to the vote of the people on a ballot referendum in 2012 and it was defeated in large part due to the great work of the Church, particularly the Catholic archdiocese of Boston."

The ballot measure was defeated 51-49 percent after a "ferocious political battle," The Boston Globe reported at the time. 

Opponents of the "death with dignity" referundum organized in the final weeks after a poll showed support for the measure, the newspaper reported, and the public was flooded with messages of opposition from religious leaders, pro-life activists, and a physicians group.  

Beckwith

The bill requires two witnesses to sign a written request for the lethal drugs. However, one of the witnesses can legally be someone who stands to enjoy an inheritance from the person that is about to die, which creates an obvious scenario for greed.

Beckwith gives one chilling example: a dying woman’s grandson convinces her to swallow the poison pill while scheming with a girlfriend to sign as witnesses. But there is little evidence of their misdeeds.

“There would be no record for the rest of the family members to know what actually happened,” Beckwith says, “because doctors are prohibited from putting anything on the death certificate other than the underlying disease.”

Beckwith expects pushback this time around and is urging the public to contact their legislators and tell them to oppose the “death with dignity” legislation.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's your reaction to Democrats' passing two articles of impeachment against President Trump?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Democrats on Judiciary Committee pass impeachment articles
Trump says US, China have reached deal; Sunday tariffs off
Big win for conservatives in Britain
Praise continues for Trump's move against anti-Semitism
Alabama officer badly wounded, suspect dead after shooting

LATEST FROM THE WEB

House panel to hold key impeachment vote, after day of all-out sparring and intrigue
Cory Booker didn't qualify for the next Dem debate, but still says he has a 'path to victory'
Dems deliver how-to lesson in 'quid pro quo' ... on guns
Impeachment markup heats up as Nadler says 'we cannot rely on an election' to oust Trump
Ben Sasse causes liberal implosion on social media after he admits FISA abuse accusations were true

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
NRLC: Abortion extremists pushing voters to the right

NY Gov. Cuomo signing abortion lawA recent poll indicates the pro-life/pro-abortion split among Americans is holding steady – but that more than ever, the issue will determine who they vote for. A prominent pro-life group contends that's because voters have gotten a wake-up call.