Another 'buffer zone' gets tossed out of court

Tuesday, November 21, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

gavel brown 620x300Abortion proponents in New Jersey failed in a legal attack based on false allegations against pro-life counselors. 

Englewood passed a “buffer zone” law designed to keep pro-life activists from contact with pregnant women entering the local late-term abortion clinic, Metropolitan Medical Associates.

However, the law also acted to keep them away from other medical facilities.

Marie Tasy of New Jersey Right to Life explains why U.S. District Court Judge Susan Wigenton has now ruled the ordinance unconstitutional. 

Tasy

“The ordinance established a buffer zone that extended to eight feet on either side of the clinic's doorway and its driveway,” Tasy says. “So it was very, very broad and the court found that the Englewood abortion clinic had not tried a less-restrictive approach to governing the clinic entrance before enacting this ordinance.” 

The ordinance barred pro-lifers from distributing pro-life literature to women, even if those women requested it. 

According to court documents, the sidewalk counselors had been accused of shouting and pushing people, and blocking entrances. 

“No, that is not true,” Tasy tells OneNewsNow. “In fact, the court found no evidence of any arrests or clinic harassment or violence in the last five years or more. The court therefore said that the buffer zone law was unjustified.” 

The judge's decision was based in part on a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that a 35-foot buffer zone law passed in Massachusetts was unconstitutional. 

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Are you surprised a prominent Democrat is questioning the usefulness of the U.S. Constitution?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump offers a ‘Dreamers’ deal for border-money proposal
Mexican pipeline explosion kills 73, leaves nightmare of ash
US spy satellite launched into orbit from California
Trump offers immigration deal to end shutdown
Trump fires back after Mueller disputes accuracy of report
Wild week over Brexit leaves British politics in crisis mode

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump: 'Things are going very well' with North Korea
CNN blows gasket over Trump’s ‘inflammatory,’ ‘scare-mongering’ speech offering to compromise
Networks spend over 27 minutes on dubious BuzzFeed Trump story
Winter storm sweeping across US, with more than 100M Americans in its path
Mueller team disputes BuzzFeed report claiming Trump told Cohen to lie

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Texas AG: We lost case but put abortionists on trial

judge banging gavelDespite losing a court battle over a new abortion law, the Texas attorney general says the legal fight exposed abortion giant Planned Parenthood.