Pro-life legislators weigh in on medical ethics debate

Monday, March 27, 2017
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

elderly patientTexas is trying to send a message that a patient's rights and family member's rights can't be overlooked in a dire medical situation.

Over the years, OneNewsNow has reported various cases in Texas in which a critically ill patient on life support, who didn't wish to die, was refused treatment and did die. Texas Right to Life Committee attorney Emily Cook explains how that came about.

"Since 1999, Texas has been home to a law that allows hospital physicians and what's called 'ethics committees' – because they're made up of persons employed by hospitals – to override patients' wishes regarding, specifically, life-sustaining treatment," she shares.

Cook

Effectively, that gives the committee the ultimate authority as to whether to continue treatment such as artificial nutrition and hydration, dialysis, and ventilators – "And we're seeing more and more lately [that it includes] different types of blood pressure medicine; things that without a person cannot live," Cook adds.

The opinions of legal surrogates don't matter either, the attorney explains. Desperate family members, after being notified the plug is going to be pulled on their loved one, must struggle to find an attorney to file suit – or find a medical facility that will care for the patient within ten days.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued an opinion saying the "Futile Care Law" has constitutional problems, stating:

"The statute leads to the denial of a constitutionally protected interest – the right to life and the right to determine one's medical treatment. And it does so through woefully insufficient procedures – Section 166.046 [of the statute] not only denies patients sufficient notice and opportunity to be heard, it does not even afford patients with a neutral arbiter to decide their fate."

Proposals before both houses of the state legislature, if passed, would require the hospital to keep a patient alive and to find the alternative source to sustain the life until he or she can be transferred. The House bill is HB 4090; the Senate version is SB 1213.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Who deserves the blame for Trump having to declare a national emergency at the southern border?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

US-backed Syria force says IS holding 1,000 civilians
Iran pressures Europe for more effort to save nuclear deal
France’s yellow vests mark 3 months amid racist tensions
State Department: Nauert out as pick for UN ambassador
Police: Aurora attacker used gun he shouldn't have owned
Judge: Mississippi suit to cover all who lost voting rights
Illinois man being fired from job fatally shoots 5 workers
Trump emergency declaration faces fights in the courts
Nigeria delays its election; candidates rush back to capital

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Two witnesses back account Rosenstein considered taping Trump
Former top FBI lawyer: 2 Trump Cabinet officials were ‘ready to support’ 25th Amendment effort
Pence chastises EU, rejects Merkel's call to work with Russia
Critical new evidence busts Jussie Smollett assault case wide open as he lawyers up
Video: Icy Missouri highway leaves one dead in 47-car pile-up

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Pro-lifers find great hope in Senate vote

Defund Planned ParenthoodA leading pro-life group believes that Thursday's Senate vote on former President Obama's executive order on Planned Parenthood funding offers a hint of hope for eventually defunding the nation's largest abortion-provider.