Capitol Hill lawmakers preforming CPR on ERA

Friday, February 14, 2020
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. Capitol 2Can the deadline for the controversial Equal Rights Amendment be removed retroactively? House Democrats – and a few Republicans – are trying to do exactly that three decades after the deadline has expired.

Yesterday, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to remove a deadline for the Equal Rights Amendment. "There is no expiration date on equality,'' said Representative Jackie Speier (D-California), the resolution's sponsor.

Following a two-thirds vote in both chambers of Congress, three-fourths of the states (38 of 50) are required for ratification of a constitutional amendment. The deadline for state ratification of the ERA was in 1982, but legislators in states such as Virginia have been pushing the legislation – and passage there in January made it the 38th state to ratify it. Critics, however, argue the deadline for ratification has passed – and some states have rescinded their approval over the years.

Advocates say the ERA is meant to prohibit discrimination on sex – but speaking on American Family Radio, Penny Nance, CEO of Concerned Women of America, said this is about one thing: taxpayer-funded abortion.

Nance

"The left is looking for the ability to force states to strike down any prohibitions on abortion," said Nance.

The House voted 232-183 this week to remove the deadline for the Equal Rights Amendment. Five male Republicans joined 227 Democrats in voting for the measure.

Meanwhile, liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Monday described the Democrats' efforts as moot – and said she thinks it best for Congress to start over with the Equal Rights Amendment. "I would like to see a new beginning," she told an audience at a Georgetown law school event.

Nance wants equal treatment for both sides of the issue. "If we're going to recognize Virginia passing it, we also have to recognize the … states that want to rescind their passage," she concluded. "It's bad policy and we have to fight it."

No Democrat in the House opposed the measure to remove the deadline.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

When you hear the term 'moderate Democrat,' what comes to mind?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Security adviser: I’ve seen no intel of Moscow helping Trump
Sanders wins Nevada caucuses, takes national Democratic lead
DEA agent accused of conspiring with cartel
US leads training exercises in Africa amid focus on Sahel
Bloomberg : 3 women can be released on non-disclosure deals
At Trump’s India rally, Modi bets on bolstering his image
Sanders condemns Russian influence in election

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Philip Haney, DHS whistleblower, found dead, police say
Biden after Nevada: 'We're alive, we're coming back'
Bernie Sanders riled by reports Moscow has meddled in election to aid his campaign
Untraceable coronavirus clusters emerge, worrying health officials
Trump accuses 'crazy' Dems of 'disinformation,' predicts Nevada caucus problems during Vegas rally

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Scott: Trump black support to surge at least 50% in 2020

Trump with black pastorsAfrican American Sen. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) foresees a major increase in support from the black community for President Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election – compared to his numbers in the 2016 contest against Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.