Sanders', Warren's Medicare for All not as it seems

Wednesday, October 16, 2019
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Sanders, Warren embracingEven though two Democratic presidential primary frontrunners tout their universal healthcare program as “Medicare for All,” one expert in the medical field stresses that it is not today’s Medicare for all.

"The full-blown Medicare for All being backed by Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) essentially eliminates Medicare as seniors know it right now," says Merrill Matthews, Ph.D. of the Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI). "They will all be in a new plan that is not like Medicare. It's supposed to be much more comprehensive, but it is not the Medicare that seniors know."

Other candidates for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination have Medicare plans.

"Some of them may even call it Medicare for All, but many of those are actually sort of changes to Medicare, allowing people to buy into a Medicare plan," Matthews continues. "Under Senator Kamala Harris' (D-California) proposal, she would allow people to buy into Medicare Advantage plans, so there's variations on that, but both Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders would essentially eliminate Medicare as we know it."

One of the stated reasons from Senators Sanders and Warren for a Medicare for All system is that it would level the playing field and provide everyone the same coverage. In doing so, Sanders et al claim it would lower administrative costs and remove the headaches of choosing a health insurance plan and paying premiums or other out of pocket expenses. Still, critics say Medicare for All is not free, and taxes would go toward paying for the system. Senator Sanders acknowledged the taxes at a debate in July.

"People who have healthcare under Medicare for All would have no premiums, no deductibles no-copayments, no out of pocket expenses," Senator Sanders said during the July debate between candidates for the Democratic Party's presidential debate. "Yes, they will pay more in taxes, but less in health care for what they get."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Does President Trump deserve blame for a lack of progress on U.S.-Mexico border wall?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

2 dead in California school attack; gunman shoots self
Bevin concedes in Kentucky governor’s race
Walmart where man killed 22 reopens amid increased security
Senate confirms White House lawyer as appeals court judge
Former Massachusetts governor joins Dem presidential race
New barrage of Gaza rockets fired into Israel

LATEST FROM THE WEB

The president - not diplomats - sets 'official foreign policy'
Franklin Graham: 'Pray for Kanye - the Devil will try to discourage & destroy him'
Jag's QB Nick Foles blasts 'prosperity gospel,' says life has 'trials along the way'
Pelosi refers to reporter as 'Mr. Republican talking points'
Kellyanne Conway rips into CNN's Wolf Blitzer

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
It could be Sessions' seat to lose, says analyst

AG Jeff Sessions speaking at DOJA political analyst has no doubt Jeff Sessions would win back his old Alabama Senate seat if he challenges the Democratic incumbent next year.