Abortion bill would make Ill. America's abortion capital

Thursday, May 30, 2019
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

abortion and U.S. CapitolOne attorney for a conservative law firm believes that Illinois’ Reproductive Health Act is actually a worse bill than what legislators initially approved.

Peter Breen – an attorney for the Illinois-based Thomas More Society legal firm – contends that preborn children are in much more danger than many thought under the problematic piece of legislation.

"The Reproductive Health Act in Illinois would legalize – essentially without restriction – third-trimester abortions up to the moment of birth," Breen pointed out, according to his firm. "It also wipes away the health and safety licensing requirements that currently are in effect in Illinois, and it makes a broad-based insurance mandate to require private insurance plans to cover elective abortions."

Breen also noted that the bill – which passed the Illinois House and now awaits a Senate vote – would repeal nearly every abortion-specific conscience protection that was in effect up to this time.

"It was made clear during the floor debate in the Illinois House that they are looking to have women from other states – where these abortions are currently illegal or otherwise restricted – they want them coming to Illinois to abort their children," the pro-life attorney added. “Already, Illinois is seeing in recent years an uptick of women from neighboring states who are avoiding waiting periods – or other parental consent requirements. or the like – coming to Illinois to abort their babies. If it becomes law, it would turn Illinois into an abortion capital for America."

In February, Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.) signed his state's version of the Reproductive Health Act. The piece of legislation allows for abortions until birth – while also making it possible for “qualified” and “authorized” physician assistants, nurse practitioners and licensed midwives to provide abortion care.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Should the United States use military force against Iran after it attacked Saudi Arabia?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

More than 1,000 rescues, evacuations as Imelda soaks Texas
Trump scores a victory in bicoastal battle over tax returns
Buttigieg calls Warren 'extremely evasive' on health taxes
Sanford takes his first 2020 campaign trip to New Hampshire
North Carolina university shooting suspect pleads guilty
In Israel, calls for unity reveal deep divisions after vote
Iran envoy: 'All-out war' to result if hit for Saudi attack
Trump scorns complaint about call with foreign leader

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Yang: We might need to eliminate car ownership
Ocasio-Cortez's latest challenger tells what makes her different from the controversial congresswoman
New Women's March board member booted after two days on the job over anti-Semitic tweets
Time to un-tell the Trayvon lies
Princeton study confirms: Gog and Magog a realistic scenario

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Pelosi: FB a Russia 'enabler,' keeps $1M in stocks

Pelosi's straight-arm policyEven though she is a proud shareholder of $1 million in Facebook stock – buying into FB in 2012 and increasing her investment last year – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is now calling the social media giant a “willing enabler of Russia interference” in the 2016 presidential election.