Abortion a deductible medical expense? Who knew?

Thursday, May 16, 2019
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Schedule A (IRS form)Self-described "progressives" often use the terms mentioned in the same sentence, but a GOP congressman – and many others – says "abortion" is not "health care."

Yesterday, Representative Andy Biggs (R-Arizona) introduced the Abortion Is Not Health Care Act, which would end the Internal Revenue Service's treatment of out-of-pocket abortion costs as a medical expense. The GOP lawmaker spoke on Wednesday with host Tony Perkins on Washington Watch.

"Most people don't realize that you can claim an abortion as an out-of-pocket medical expense under the IRS code and get a deduction for that," Biggs said on the radio. "People who are pro-abortion … want the world to think that that is an integral component to normal health care – and it simply isn't."

Biggs

Instead, said Biggs, "it's basically snuffing out the life of one person – and I don't know how you can even begin to justify that and call it health care."

The 13-line bill, which would add a new subsection to Section 213 of the IRS Code of 1986, simply states:

"An amount paid during the taxable year for an abortion shall not be taken into account under subsection (a). The amendment made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act."

The measure, which has yet to assigned a bill number, has the support of various lawmakers and organizations, including Arizona Right to Life.

"Healthcare heals the body and mind and saves lives," says Rachel LeBeau, executive director of Arizona Right to Life, in a statement on the congressman's website. "Abortion is the opposite of healthcare – it ends the life of a human being and can severely damage the body and mind of the aborted child's mother.

Tom McClusky, president of March for Life Action, says a child in the womb "is as human as you or I." He continues:

"Congressman Biggs deserves praise for his bill making it clear that the deliberate destruction of an unborn child is not healthcare," says McClusky. "The American experience has always been one of hope for future generations – our laws should reflect that hope and not the cynicism of abortion."

On his website, Rep. Biggs maintains that members of Congress have a duty to protect life from the moment of conception. That's why he finds it "unfathomable" that Democrats on Capitol Hill continue to support the practice of abortion – and even allow taxpayer dollars to subsidize it.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

When I hear politicians twist scripture for their personal benefit, I …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

FBI lawyer investigated over altered Russia probe document
AG Barr: Epstein’s death was a ‘perfect storm of screw-ups’
California court invalidates law requiring Trump tax returns
Leading white Democrats court black votes; some find trouble
  Lawsuit challenges Medicaid work requirements in Michigan
Court: Dutch govt doesn’t have to repatriate children of terrorists

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Pelosi is already attacking the legitimacy of the 2020 Election
Another alleged racist hoax strikes again
Public schools K–12: Reality fades to zero
What to do when the Chikin is chicken?
The tragedy of the ‘trans’ child

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Pelosi: FB a Russia 'enabler,' keeps $1M in stocks

Pelosi's straight-arm policyEven though she is a proud shareholder of $1 million in Facebook stock – buying into FB in 2012 and increasing her investment last year – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is now calling the social media giant a “willing enabler of Russia interference” in the 2016 presidential election.