Staver: LGBT 'rights' sneakily added to anti-lynching bill

Tuesday, January 8, 2019
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. Capitol 3A constitutional law expert is asking Congress to block the latest attempt to force the LGBT agenda on the country.

The Justice for Victims of Lynching Act passed unanimously in the U.S. Senate but Liberty Counsel founder Mat Staver says it passed without some senators realizing an amendment was added providing special rights for homosexuals and transgenders.

He calls that amendment the proverbial camel's nose under the tent.

Staver

"The old saying is once that camel gets the nose in the tent, you can't stop them from coming the rest of the way in," he explains. "And this would be the first time that you would have in federal law mentioning gender identity and sexual orientation as part of this anti-lynching bill."

No one can or should oppose a bill that bans lynching, says the Liberty Counsel attorney, and thus it's being used as back door approach to pass legislation such as the controversial Employment Non-Discrimination Act.

"So far they've been unsuccessful over the many years in the past," Staver observes, "but this is a way to slip it in under a so-called anti-lynching bill, and to then to sort of circle the wagon and then go for the juggler at some time in the future."

Staver tells OneNewsNow that Liberty Counsel is talking to lawmakers in the House in an effort to convince them to strip the bill of the amendment before taking a vote.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How would you describe President Trump's 'go back' tweets directed at 'progressive' Democratic congresswomen?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump abortion restrictions effective immediately
Final blast of torrential rains unleashed by weakened Barry
Joe Biden draws line against progressives on health care
Booker's Iowa senior adviser leaves, citing personal reasons
Avenatti: R. Kelly paid $2M to silence girl he assaulted
Trump moves to end asylum protections for Central Americans
Trump signs order to make American-made goods more American

LATEST FROM THE WEB

'They are endorsing Socialism' — President Trump fires back at Ocasio-Cortez 'squad' as they hold media conference
AOC 'squad' refers to Trump as 'occupant' of White House, condemns 'racist' remarks, as Trump fires back
Kamala Harris blasts, and takes money from, Jeffrey Epstein’'s Llaw firm
The great transgender 'awokening'
The arrogance and the ignorance: “weapon-grade stupid” status

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
'Blowhard' Bloomberg wants Trump out of White House

Michael BloombergNew York City's wealthy mayor is far too liberal to be a serious presidential candidate, says a longtime political analyst.