See, government can be 'innovative' after all

Monday, September 12, 2016
 | 
Charlie Butts (OneNewsNow.com)

Obama the bully (at American Univ.)President Barack Obama is making a controversial move to pour more tax dollars into Planned Parenthood.

Title X funds, which cover family planning, are managed by the federal Health and Human Services and distributed to the states, including states where legislators have voted to stop the flow of funds to Planned Parenthood.

Those new laws stipulate no more funding for organizations that perform abortions, explains Jim Sedlak of American Life League.

"And therefore Planned Parenthood does not get money in some of the states," the pro-life activist further explains.

Responding to the pushback against his political ally, Obama has instructed HHS to stipulate that the "recipients," meaning the states, can't use any methods to select  the"subrecipients," meaning Planned Parenthood abortuaries and other health clinics. 

The proposed rule can be read here.

Sedlak says that rule takes away any flexibility the states have and also ensures that Planned Parenthood gets the funds.

Reacting to the proposed rule, Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn) has called that a "shady" rule change and an "unprecedented step" that thwarts states' rights.

The nation's top abortion business has reported profit of over $120 millon and receives over a half-billion in federal tax dollars.

Meanwhile, pro-life groups argue tht local, tax-supported health facilities can more effectively deliver medical services than Planned Parenthood. 

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How would you describe President Trump's 'go back' tweets directed at 'progressive' Democratic congresswomen?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump abortion restrictions effective immediately
Final blast of torrential rains unleashed by weakened Barry
Joe Biden draws line against progressives on health care
Booker's Iowa senior adviser leaves, citing personal reasons
Avenatti: R. Kelly paid $2M to silence girl he assaulted
Trump moves to end asylum protections for Central Americans
Trump signs order to make American-made goods more American

LATEST FROM THE WEB

'They are endorsing Socialism' — President Trump fires back at Ocasio-Cortez 'squad' as they hold media conference
AOC 'squad' refers to Trump as 'occupant' of White House, condemns 'racist' remarks, as Trump fires back
Kamala Harris blasts, and takes money from, Jeffrey Epstein’'s Llaw firm
The great transgender 'awokening'
The arrogance and the ignorance: “weapon-grade stupid” status

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Trump's energy may leave Hillary behind

Donald Trump on campaign trailA conservative political scientist and election analyst believes Donald Trump has several advantages that have helped him surge in the polls in recent weeks.