Wicker explains how Senate avoided 'nuclear option'

Wednesday, July 17, 2013
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

A Republican U.S. senator is pleased that a compromise has been reached by the Senate in order to avert a “nuclear option" crisis. 

U.S. Senator Roger Wicker (R-Mississippi) says after a series of bipartisan meetings, a compromise was reached over two nominees to the National Labor Relations Board.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) had threatened to change the rules and impose the "nuclear option" to end the ability of 41 senators in the 100-member chamber to block action on White House nominations other than judges.

Reid was frustrated that Republicans refused to move forward with nine Obama appointments.

Wicker, Roger (R-Mississippi)According to Wicker, the Obama administration agreed to “pull” the two NLRB nominees.

“And that's the case that has actually been ruled in our favor as an unconstitutional recess appointment by the second highest court in the land,” Wicker tells OneNewsNow. “And it's on its way to the U.S. Supreme Court."

Wicker believes the high court will rule that the president of the United States does not get to decide if Congress is or is not in session for purposes of recess appointments.   

"What he did was a flagrant overreach. And the appeals court has ruled that is an overreach and that it was unconstitutional in fact," says Wicker. "And I have every confidence that we will win a victory there, and this power grab on behalf of President Obama will not be allowed to stand. And we preserved our right to make that case."

Wicker says he hopes this compromise will enable the Senate to get past partisan gridlock and back to doing the work of the American people.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Should vaccination of children be decided by parents/guardians – or by government regulations?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Directors guild files disciplinary charges against Weinstein
Japan votes for lower house; Abe's party seen headed for win
5 former presidents appear together for hurricane relief
No. 1 Alabama routs struggling rival Tennessee, 45-7
54 Egyptian police killed in ambush, say officials
Trump jabs back at 'wacky' congresswoman as spat rolls on
Foreigners who joined IS faced almost certain death in Raqqa

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Property-rights advocates to Trump: Restore Americans' land rights
Trump announces release of long-awaited JFK files
Why should we care about crackpot professors?
Rachel Maddow called out by fellow liberals for pushing anti-Trump conspiracy
Trump says he intends to allow release of classified files on Kennedy assassination

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Keystone-related jobs a ‘blip’? Really, Mr. President?

An energy research organization finds Barack Obama's latest comments on the Keystone XL pipeline "troublesome." Those same comments also have raised the hackles of the Canadian company proposing the pipeline.