The U.N. operates on very strange logic. That somehow a democracy of unfree countries voting produces a result that has something to do with the value of freedom. It's somewhat akin to trial by jury where most of the jurors are convicted criminals.
Following the U.N. General Assembly vote condemning the United States' recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and Ambassador Nikki Haley's bold speech to that body following the vote, Haley has announced that the 2018 budget for the U.N. will be cut by $285 million.
According to the Council on Foreign Relations, the United States contributed $10 billion to the U.N. in 2016, about 25 percent of its total budget.
So $285 million is not a game-changing sum. But this is a significant step to put the U.N. – and the world – on notice that President Donald Trump means what he says. "We will no longer let the generosity of the American people be taken advantage of or remain unchecked," said Haley.
One hundred and twenty eight nations in the General Assembly voted to condemn and annul the U.S. decision on Jerusalem and only nine voted to support the United States.
As Haley pointed out, this vote had implications beyond this one, albeit critically important, issue. It was about American values, the coincidence of American values with the United States' support of Israel, and a reassessment of the United States' role in the U.N.
The United States and Israel stand for the "ideals of human freedom and dignity that the United Nations is supposed to be about," said Ambassador Haley.
Looking at the particular realities of the U.N., it's hard to see coincidence between these American values and what is going on there.
Freedom House in Washington, DC, issues an annual report in which it reports on the state of freedom in 193 nations around the world. Each nation is evaluated in terms of political rights and civil liberties, and then is given a score. According to this score, nations are then broken out into three categories – free, partly free and not free.
Of the 128 nations that voted this week against the United States move on Jerusalem, only 55, or 43 percent, are rated by Freedom House as free. The rest have serious problems regarding political rights and/or civil liberties in their country.
The U.N. operates on very strange logic. That somehow a democracy of unfree countries voting – one vote for each country – produces a result that has something to do with the value of freedom.
It's somewhat akin to trial by jury where most of the jurors are convicted criminals.
What, after all, can be the meaning of despotic nations like North Korea, Cuba, Syria, Iran and Venezuela voting to express their opinion of the legitimacy of the United States recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital?
Adding further irony, Israel is rated by Freedom House as one of the freest nations in the world. In the Middle East/North Africa region, there are two nations out of 18 that are free. One is Israel. Yet, Israel is regularly condemned by the U.N., whereas the 16 despotic regimes in that region get no attention.
Why should the United States continue to be the largest contributor to the U.N. for what Haley called the "dubious distinction" of being disrespected and having its values flouted?
A few days before the U.N. vote, Trump gave a speech at the Reagan Building in Washington defining his National Security Strategy. He stated that "a nation that is not certain of its values cannot summon the will to defend them."
As we enter the new year, Americans should feel pride and optimism that, at last, it appears we have an American administration that is certain of our values – human freedom and dignity as stated by Nikki Haley – and is ready to boldly demonstrate the "will to defend" these values.
It's about time the United States is getting real about the United Nations. President Trump should get high-fives for his leadership.
COPYRIGHT 2017 STAR PARKER DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
Star Parker (firstname.lastname@example.org) is an author and president of CURE, the Center for Urban Renewal and Education.
This column is printed with permission. Opinions expressed in 'Perspectives' columns published by OneNewsNow.com are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network, OneNewsNow.com, our parent organization or its other affiliates.
Consider Supporting Us?
The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.
We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details
Kavanaugh's accuser makes more demands for testimony agreement
WASHINGTON (September 21, 2018) — Christine Blasey Ford is making more demands before she will agree to testify about her claim that she was sexually assaulted by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh more than 35 years ago.