Racialist obsessions & Trump Derangement Syndrome void Pulitzers

Tuesday, May 12, 2020
Robert Knight - Guest Columnist

If any more evidence was needed that America's major media are reflexively un-American, this year's Pulitzer Prizes should put that to rest.

Each year, the Papers of Record take turns giving each other Pulitzers. You know who they are. They usually throw in a small newspaper or two, but for the most part, the winners are the usual suspects.

Leading the pack for 2020 was the New York Times, with three wins.  The most noteworthy was Nikole Hannah-Jones' prize in the commentary category for her introductory essay to the paper's "1619 Project."

That's the "educational" series that re-dates America's founding as the year 1619, when 20 slaves were brought to Virginia.  It's already finding its way into classrooms all over the country, a fitting accompaniment to the communist Howard Zinn's fraudulent "A People's History of the United States." (See OneNewsNow's reports on "1619 Project.")

So, forget 1607, when John Smith and others established the Jamestown Colony.  Never mind 1620, when the Pilgrims came to Plymouth, Massachusetts.  Or 1776, when the Declaration of Independence was signed by John Hancock and the rest of the brave colonists who bucked the world's leading power.

Forget also 1787, when the United States Constitution, the framework for the freest and most prosperous nation in history, was drafted, or 1788, when it was ratified.

No, there's only one meaningful aspect to America – its uniquely awful history of slavery.  As the series proclaims: "anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country."

The Times, and apparently the Pulitzer committee, seem oblivious that slavery was commonly practiced on every settled continent, and still exists in communist nations like North Korea, China and some Muslim countries.

Pulitzer PrizePulitzer Prizes Administrator Dana Canedy, a former New York Times editor who was part of a team that won a Pulitzer in 2001 for a series on race, defended the choice while conceding that it might not be everybody's cup of tea.

"Although many historians, perhaps most historians, believe that the preservation of slavery was not among the primary causes of the Revolutionary War, we do not regard this as a matter of settled 'fact,'" she said.

Wonder if she's as broad-minded about scientists who question claims about human-caused climate change? Or would that be "settled fact?"

By the way, the Washington Post won an explanatory reporting Pulitzer this year for its series on "extreme climate change," which basically says the planet is doomed unless we depopulate or ditch fossil fuels for windmills and solar panels.

As for the 1619 Project, a number of prominent historians have panned it, including Gordon Wood, professor emeritus of history at Brown:

Slavery "existed for thousands of years without substantial criticism," he told the World Socialist website, as related by Peter Kirsanow in National Review.  "… But it's the American Revolution that makes it a problem for the world. And the first real anti-slave movement takes place in North America. So this is what's missed by these essays in the 1619 Project."

Well, it's not the first time the New York Times missed something big.

In 1932, The Times' Moscow bureau chief, Walter Duranty, won a Pulitzer for reporting that all was well in the USSR, even as Joseph Stalin was killing millions, mostly in Ukraine, by starvation and executions.

"There is no famine or actual starvation nor is there likely to be," Duranty wrote for the Times in November 1931. "Any report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda," he added in August 1933.

Despite calls for the Pulitzer committee and the New York Times to rescind Duranty's award, it's now joined by Ms. Hannah-Jones' fake history essay alongside the paper's other 128 Pulitzers.

The glaring fact is that journalists are unlikely to win a reporting or commentary Pulitzer unless they advance leftist views.

"It's bad enough that the Pulitzer winner was the essayist for the '1619 Project,' which is a miscasting of U.S. history [that purports] it's only racist, nothing else, nothing good in American history, just racism. But this is not isolated – it's part of a pattern …. In many cases the Pulitzers are awarded for the advancement of leftist views, usually anti-American views."  

"[The Washington Post and the New York Times] provided the fuel for the Mueller investigation; they kept it alive. They recorded in hysterical tones that Trump had somehow maneuvered with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton – and they got a Pulitzer for that."

Columnist Robert Knight
(in an interview with OneNewsNow)

In 2018, the New York Times won a national reporting Pulitzer with the Washington Post for writing on "Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign."

This was the core of the Russian collusion hoax that triggered the fruitless Mueller investigation.  The prize-winning series included three headlined articles naming Michael Flynn, the former Trump national security advisor who was entrapped by FBI agents and who the Justice Department exonerated on Thursday.

The real story is the Obama Administration's weaponizing the FBI against Mr. Trump during the 2016 campaign while ignoring starkly obvious Russian collusion by the Democrats, such as paying for the now-debunked Steele dossier.  Also, Joe Biden's admission on tape of bribing Ukraine officials with $1 billion in U.S. aid into firing a prosecutor looking into his son Hunter Biden's lucrative Ukraine business venture.

In 2019, the Times won for an "investigation of President Donald Trump's finances."  No sign of the Clintons, who piled up $240 million in 15 years after Bill left office.

The paper also won in 2019 for editorials that "charted the racial fault lines in the United States at a polarizing moment in the nation's history."

I wonder what keeps polarizing us?

Could it be the 24/7 racialist obsession and Trump Derangement Syndrome of the Democrats and their Pulitzer-winning media?

Robert Knight is a OneNewsNow contributor. His latest book is "The Coming Communist Wave:  What Happens If the Left Captures All Three Branches of Government" (djkm.org, 2020). This column ran originally in The Washington Times.

This column is printed with permission. Opinions expressed in 'Perspectives' columns published by OneNewsNow.com are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network, OneNewsNow.com, our parent organization or its other affiliates.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details





Do you agree the virus pandemic has impacted our constitutional rights?





Memorial Day weekend draws crowds and triggers warnings
Slowly, surely, US houses of worship emerge from lockdown
White House imposes coronavirus travel ban on Brazil
Israel’s Netanyahu attacks justice system as trial begins
Desperate Indian girl bikes 745 miles home with disabled dad
Hong Kong police fire tear gas, water cannon at protesters
Taliban, Ghani declare three-day cease fire for Eid holiday


Sen. Rick Scott: Bill of Rights allows Americans to worship at church service, no matter what gov't leaders say
Will Trump order sanctions on China's president for Hong Kong crackdown?
Beto O’Rourke mocks Texas governor’s reopening message – then hears back from Crenshaw, Cruz
Opinion — Newt Gingrich: On Memorial Day, we have a duty to honor Americans who died defending our country
Trump to attend Wednesday's NASA astronaut launch in Florida


Cartoon of the Day