Left desperate to prevent a conservative majority on SCOTUS

Tuesday, September 18, 2018
 | 
Robert Knight - Guest Columnist

Robert KnightThe most powerful evidence that federal judges have eclipsed the other branches of government is the circus surrounding President Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. This should not be as big a deal as it is.


"The Constitution poses no threat to our current form of government."

That was the late Joe Sobran's ironic take mostly on the courts' blatantly unconstitutional usurpations over the past few decades.

The most powerful evidence that federal judges have eclipsed the other branches of government is the circus surrounding President Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court. This should not be as big a deal as it is.

Kavanaugh hearing - protesterIf you missed it, dozens of screaming women, some costumed, were dragged from the confirmation hearings. Democratic senators, who egged on the zany demonstrators, interrupted the initial proceedings themselves more than 75 times.

Outside the hearing, a "Code Pink" man wearing a head-to-toe condom emblazoned with "Men for Choice" roamed the halls in a performance that failed to attract reporters. He did not fit the media narrative framing Republicans as the lunatic threat to the republic.

"Progressives" have good reason to worry. President Donald Trump's first Supreme Court appointment of a constitutional conservative, Neil Gorsuch, has already borne fruit. Seated on April 10, 2017, Justice Gorsuch has voted consistently as a strict originalist. That means he takes the U.S. Constitution as written and not how it has been twisted by courts over the years.

"During his short tenure so far on the bench," wrote Ken Klukowski, general counsel of the American Civil Rights Union, "Gorsuch has proven himself a strictly principled jurist who had not deviated even once from the original public meaning of any provision in the Constitution or federal law." Oh, the horror.

For the left and the media, which depend heavily on the courts to impose socialism and sexual anarchy, the prospect of another Gorsuch merits an Armageddon-level response. A 5-4 conservative majority on the court will no longer rubberstamp the left's radical agenda and may even begin to reverse some of it. No wonder they've become unglued.

U.S. ConstitutionThe government exists to serve the people, not the other way around. On the handwritten copy of the Constitution, ratified 231 years ago on Sept. 17, 1787, the Preamble begins with We the People – not We the Ruling Elites – in larger letters than the rest of the text.

In recent years, the Preamble has been misused, however, as an excuse to expand federal power. It outlines broad objectives for the government, but the Preamble does not confer any authority whatever. That is left to the articles that list the various powers of each branch and of the states.

Despite clear direction from the Founders that the Constitution is to serve as a check on government, the phrase "promote the general Welfare" has been a blank check for increasing centralized power.

When they lose at the polls, "progressives" deploy the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center and other legal guns to shop for sympathetic judges who see the Constitution as a "living document."

Hence, rulings are filled with "penumbras" and "emanations" you can't find in the Constitution, such as "the separation of church and state," "freedom of expression," "the right to privacy," "social justice," and even "democracy."

In some areas – particularly in family law – abuse of the Constitution by so-called civil liberty groups has facilitated moral breakdown and dependency.

They have traded the Founders' biblically – and family-grounded worldview for a secularized, libertine model of human beings as detached individuals rather than as mothers and fathers, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, grandmothers and grandfathers, uncles and aunts, and as members of organically connected communities. As Marx and Engels opined, the family and church must be eliminated as competitors to the socialist state.

Without God, as John Adams noted, a limited government cannot work because citizens would not have enough self-control. The less personal responsibility, the more we need bureaucrats, programs, police, prosecutors and prisons, plus academics to study it all. Which – except for the cops, whom they clearly disdain –  is how the "progressives" like it.

It's why they will fight to the death to keep the Supreme Court – and the Constitution – from thwarting their plan to fundamentally transform America.

They probably can't stop Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation, but they hope to make enough noise to motivate their voters to flip at least one house of Congress in November. Their success or failure – and that of the Trump administration – will depend on which base turns out.


Robert Knight is a Washington Times contributor and the author of "A Strong Constitution: What Would America Look Like if We Followed the Law"" (djkm.org, May 2018). This column first appeared on The Washington Times' website.

This column is printed with permission. Opinions expressed in 'Perspectives' columns published by OneNewsNow.com are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network, OneNewsNow.com, our parent organization or its other affiliates.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION
We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What does Pinterest's banning of a pro-life group tell you about that social media platform?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump threatens to deport millions of illegals beginning next week
New York state OKs licenses for illegals
US sending troops to Mideast amid Gulf tensions over Iran
Thousands already lining up for big Trump rally in Orlando
Facebook plans its own currency for 2 billion-plus users

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Driver's license trick to result in seizing your guns?
Campus food service worker hit with bias complaint after saying ‘hello’ to student in Japanese
TUCKER CARLSON: How libs turned California into disgusting pit of poverty
Did your child return from college a better person?
Harvard demonstrates once again that post-Christian America is post-forgiveness America

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day