The looming conflict

Monday, July 8, 2013
Kevin McCullough - Guest Columnist

Kevin McCullough"Pride" participants and sexual activists wish people of faith to be silenced. The intolerance with which they insist upon runs directly contrary to the tolerance which they constantly say they are in need of. Now enters ENDA, perhaps making the legal and cultural confrontation even more likely.

There is a clear and coming showdown that will determine the soul of the republic. Not in fiscal or physical stature per se, but definitively in the arena of what has held America as unique for most of her history.

With the erosion of cultural norms to no longer truly recognize the difference between the moral and the immoral, the idea that such differences even matter cause college professors to laugh, and elementary teachers to ask your children "special" questions about the "teachings" of your family's faith.

Perhaps nowhere is this erosion more prevalent than the fact that grotesquely offensive public behavior is tolerated and encouraged to be on display under events labeled as "PRIDE." (Anyone caught objecting to the nudity, public sex, and debauchery is immediately labeled hateful.)

This past week at a "pride" event in Seattle, participants in the events openly assaulted those they perceived to be opposing them on religious grounds. In the Seattle event -- which is particularly relevant because it took place under American laws -- two 20-something young men, one holding a banner that had not a single word referring to "Pride" or "homosexuality" but did utilize the words "Jesus" and the most offensive of all "repent" -- were savagely attacked by those attending the "festivities."

In a similarly recent event in Toronto, a mob swarmed similar youth displaying a similar message. In April a group who labeled themselves "Angry Queers" attacked Mars Hill Church in Portland battering windows with baseball-sized rocks, destroying nine of them. And of course last year, an admitted activist intended to shoot and kill dozens at the offices of a Washington think-tank that advocates primarily on behalf of American families. His intended calling card was to leave a Chic-fil-A sandwich on the body of each of his victims.

What is clear through this litany of activist-oriented violence against people of faith is the intention.

Pride participants and sexual activists wish people of faith to be silenced. The intolerance with which they insist upon runs directly contrary to the tolerance which they constantly say they are in need of.

But the principles will likely be coming to an even more defined confrontation legally and culturally soon. As activists have declared that the Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2013 must be passed and made law, they are also simultaneously begging President Obama to act by executive fiat and to not wait for the legislative process.

In a piece authored recently by Liz Abzug and Heather Cronk, they openly suggest that the president create a law that would prevent employers from being able to hire someone based on their personal view of morality -- specifically declining anyone a job merely because they engage in homosexual sexual behavior.

Let me pose an example ...

Say you're a store operator and you hire a stockroom professional whose sexuality you don't know about, nor care about when you hire him. Simply wanting a stockroom professional who can see to it that inventory is where it is supposed to be is normally thought to be sufficient. Turns out, your stockroom professional ends up having a same-sex boyfriend who frequently stops by, gives him a little "have a great afternoon" kiss in front of customers at the end of his lunch hour, and now your customers -- particularly those with kids -- are stuck being exposed to something they don't wish to be. You ask him to not engage in the behavior any further -- he challenges you to do something about it -- so you fire him for damaging the reputation of the business. But he sues you and, under ENDA, wins because they perceive your termination of him was based on his state of being. But it wasn't; you fired him for behavior that was unbecoming to the welfare of your business.

One more example ...

You're a pastor at a church who is looking to hire a youth ministry director. In these times, it is prudent for church staffs and all organizations that work with youth of any sort to do background checks. At this particular church you have homosexual activists who have specifically targeted this hiring process. Knowing the church's doctrinal statement opposes homosexual behavior, the church communicates that it must only hire staff persons who agree with the doctrinal and theological positions of the church. A person who engages in homosexuality applies for the job, is declined, and sues the church under the terms of ENDA.

And so the conflict is enjoined: the direct belief that homosexual behavior must be allowed, codified, and agreed with as morally straight by everyone vs. the belief that God grants a quite narrowly defined view of sexuality that should be encouraged.

The courts will have little understanding of how one's sexual behavior could threaten the sanctity of faith, mostly because there are so few people of faith on the courts.

Churches will refuse to codify homosexual behavior as moral, and activists will sue, protest, and -- as we've seen recently -- turn violent and ugly.

How does it end?

Not terribly sure, but the conflict is coming.

And thanks to the president, the Supreme Court, and a cultural temperature set at "if it feels good do it," it doesn't look good for those who fear God.

Though according to Proverbs 9:10, that is the beginning of wisdom ...

Kevin McCullough ( hosts "AFA Today" every weekday at noon Central time on American Family Radio. He also is the nationally syndicated host of "The Kevin McCullough Show" weekdays and "Baldwin/McCullough Radio" Saturdays (9-11 p.m. EST) on more than 600 radio stations. His newest best-selling hardcover from Thomas Nelson Publishers -- "No He Can't: How Barack Obama is Dismantling Hope and Change" -- is in stores now.

This column is printed with permission. Opinions expressed in 'Perspectives' columns published by are the sole responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family News Network,, our parent organization or its other affiliates.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details




What's your reaction to the latest developments in the Uranium One investigation?





Senate backs GOP budget in step forward for tax revamp
California fires cause $1B in damage, burn 7,000 buildings
Pentagon faces demands for details on deadly attack in Niger
Puerto Rico still stumbles in the dark a month after Maria
Kelly defends Trump's call to war widow, raps congresswoman
Court to review ruling allowing abortion for illegal alien teen
US unemployment claims fall to 222,000, lowest in 44 years


First look at 8 prototypes of Trump's 'big, beautiful' border wall
'Sen. John McCain – ya gotta quit'
An NHL player ended his anthem protests in the most productive way possible
Trump blasts media for not covering Russia uranium deal
Uranium One means Mueller must recuse himself from Russia probe


Cartoon of the Day