A pro and a con on illegal immigration front

Monday, June 22, 2020
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

ICE arrest (new pic)An organization that advocates for enforcement of U.S. immigration laws is crediting a stiff new removal provision for reports that the U.S. is deporting more illegal immigrants than are coming into the country.

Apprehensions of illegal aliens have fallen significantly in recent months, due to border restrictions put in place in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. The Department of Homeland Security implemented Title 42, a provision that allows Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officers to quickly remove illegal aliens without the requirement of court hearings. The directive [PDF] comes from public health guidelines set by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Ira Mehlman with the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) tells OneNewsNow that the economic downturn decreased the incentive for people to cross the border illegally in search of jobs.

"But it just shows that if you have policies that are being carried out in a systematic way and you make it clear to people that you're not going to benefit by breaking the law, guess what? Fewer people break the law," he emphasizes. "And that's the way we enforce all civil laws in this country."

Mehlman

When the directive first went into effect in March, Immigration and Customs Enforcement removed almost 18,000 illegal aliens from the country. The following month, fewer than 17,000 apprehensions were made at the southern border, which was the second lowest mark for monthly apprehensions in the last 20 years.

While the directive was blasted by the ACLU when it went into effect, FAIR argues it will almost certainly help reduce the further spread of coronavirus from foreigners entering the U.S.

No courthouse arrests?

While FAIR likes the impact of that removal provision on illegal immigration, the organization isn't happy with a decision by a federal judge on June 10 that bars Immigration and Customs Enforcement from making courthouse arrests in New York City.

Judge Jed Rakoff wrote in an opinion [PDF] that, "The Court declares ICE's policy of courthouse arrests, as now embodied in the Directive, to be illegal." ICE already refrains from arresting illegal aliens near schools, houses of worship, and hospitals. But Mehlman contends a reasonable argument can be made that courthouses are the most appropriate and least sensitive areas to arrest an illegal alien.

"You don't just walk in there without going through a security check," he notes, "so there's no danger that the people who are subject to arrest are going to be armed. We know that they won't be armed in that case, which makes it safer for everybody."

And Mehlman points out that the Empire State doesn't ban other law enforcement agencies from executing arrest warrants in courthouses. Mehlman suggests this reveals that the judge's decision may have been driven by a political agenda.

"The federal government has the right to enforce the law anyplace in the country whether the state or local government involved likes it or not," he adds.

Mehlman is hopeful the judge's decision will be overturned on an appeal. The DOJ has 60 days to decide whether to appeal.

Comments will be temporarily unavailable. Thank you for your patience as we restore this service!

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

The main lesson for the GOP to learn from Democrats defending Maxine Waters is…

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Dems push $25B to electrify school buses, a Biden priority
US-backed Afghan peace meeting postponed, as Taliban balk
Disruption in oxygen supply kills 22 in Indian hospital
Jury reaches verdict at trial over George Floyd's death
Police: 1 killed, 2 wounded in shooting at NY grocery store
Walter Mondale, Carter's vice president, dies at 93

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Ohio police officer fatally shoots teenage girl who appears to hold a knife during fight, video show
Norfolk fires police lieutenant who donated to accused vigilante Kyle Rittenhouse
Body of Kristin Smart, 19, who disappeared in 1996 may have been 'recently' moved from under hom
Dershowitz: Chauvin guilty verdict product of jury fear, not due process
Minnesota’s Walz declares state of emergency prior to Derek Chauvin verdict

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
China-India dispute not new but one better at build-up

Chinese soldiers marchingA new border fight between China and India has cost lives and enflamed both countries, but a national security expert predicts the lethal stand-off will not escalate because neither country wants war.