No, Mattis is not defying Trump's transgender ban

Thursday, August 31, 2017
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

Trump and Gen. James MattisA military watchdog, reacting to the Pentagon's latest news on its transgender policy, is concerned about who will sit on a coming review panel. 

Defense Secretary James Mattis announced Tuesday that the Pentagon's Obama-era policy on transgender troops "will remain in place" while President Donald Trump's recent directive reversing it undergoes an expert study.

Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum last week, which followed his surprise announcement via Tweeter in July, and Mattis said in a statement that the Pentagon will "carry out the president's policy direction," which will include a panel of experts from the Department of Defense and from Homeland Security.

Once the panel releases a report, Mattis will then advise the President about implementing the policy.

"In the interim," he added, "current policy with respect to currently serving members will remain in place."  

It was unclear to some media if Mattis was reversing Trump's memorandum but Elaine Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness says the Department of Defense is following Trump's directive.  

"Now the media is trying to create an impression that somehow there is dissention between the troops and the President, that the president is picking on people unfairly," she says. "All of that is a media meme and it is really not valid."

"Mattis: Transgender troops can keep serving pending study," reads the headline from The Hill, a Washington, D.C.-based news website.

But the far-left website Vox disagreed with such observations, pointing to a similarly worded headline from USA Today and claiming both are wrong and Mattis is following through on Trump's order. 

"The president’s August 25 ban memo allowed trans service members to stay in the military up to March 23, 2018, when the ban goes into effect," Vox writer Alex Ward explains in the story.  

Donnelly tells OneNewsNow she is concerned about the composition of the review panel, singling out an Obama holdover named Anthony Kurta.

"If he is put in charge of this project," she warns, "that would be a huge mistake because Mr. Kurta has a record of defying the President in favor of the LGBT causes."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What is the most important issue raised during the congressional hearing with Google's CEO?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  White House dismisses Cohen accusations as lies
Pair of abortion restrictions in Ohio head to Kasich's desk
Florida Senate won't block election chief's suspension
McCain replacement Sen. Jon Kyl resigning at end of year
  Authorities probe why suspect wasn't stopped
Israeli troops arrest dozens in West Bank raid
UK's May sticks to her Brexit plan despite rebuff from EU

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Dershowitz: Cohen doesn't seem to understand the difference between 'wrong' and 'illegal'
Feds collect record taxes through November; still run $305.4B deficit
Communist officials threatening Cuban pastors
Former FEC commissioners: Trump-Cohen 'hush' payments not necessarily a violation
Jared Kushner as next chief of staff? Reports say Trump is considering it

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
For its own good, perhaps China needs to deal with NK

North Korean missile launch Aug 2017The regime in Beijing doesn't want to see a nuclearized South Korea and Japan to counter the growing North Korean threat. That's according to a national defense analyst with the Family Research Council.