Eyes on North Korea

Monday, March 20, 2017
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

North Korean missile launchA national defense analyst applauds Secretary of State Rex Tillerson for acknowledging that military action may be the only solution to the North Korean nuclear threat.

On Friday, Tillerson visited with North Korea on a military base near the Demilitarized Zone. Then during a news conference in Seoul, the secretary of state declared an end of the U.S. policy of "strategic patience" toward the East Asian country.

"Certainly we don't want for things to get to a military conflict," he stated. "We're quite clear on that in our communications. But obviously, if North Korea takes actions against South Korean forces or our own forces, then that will be met with an appropriate response."


Robert Maginnis, senior fellow for national security at the Family Research Council, has been saying for years that the U.S. must seriously consider taking military action to stop North Korea's march to nuclear weapons status.

"Obviously, sanctions up to now have failed to work," he observes. "The Chinese have failed to press the case that we have because, after all, they are a proxy of the Chinese Communist government. We have sat on the sidelines to a large degree since the years of the Clinton administration, watching this rogue regime develop a fairly robust ballistic missile capability."

On that note, former Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee told the Fox News Channel on Friday that China needs to take more responsibility for getting the North Korean regime under control. 

"Tillerson and the president are playing it exactly right. They're recognizing that we're not really going to have much influence over North Korea because they're led by a freaking lunatic," Huckabee said. "But the only entity that has any opportunity to put a lid on him will be China – because they need China; they depend on China. And China is the big brother who can put him in a half-Nelson and explain how it's going to be done. And I think that's exactly the right kind of pressure: put it on the third party, China, and make it clear [to China] 'If you don't get North Korea under control, you don't want the rest of us going in there and doing it, because it's not going to be pretty. So you better get your little brother under control.'" 

According to Maginnis, the North Koreans are working to miniaturize nuclear weapons to put on those missiles capable of threatening the American mainland.

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details




What's most frustrating to you about the previous moves to defund Planned Parenthood?





UK police show photo of concert bomber, ask public for info
AP source: Kushner back channel with Russia involved Syria
Trump's trip: Conventional images and unconventional talk
Rocker Gregg Allman dies at age 69; sang and lived the blues
IS claims responsibility for Egypt attack killing 29
Trump says he'll decide on Paris climate deal next week
British Airways cancels flights amid global computer outage


'Total Chaos' at London airports after British Airways is forced to cancel all flights
White House mum on new Kushner allegations in Russia probe
Left's biggest lies exposed on major TV show
Big changes reportedly coming to how Trump manages Twitter account
Coptic Christian attack: ISIS claims its 'soldiers' opened fire on bus killing 29 in Egypt


Cartoon of the Day


Obama-Clinton uranium scandal w/Russia exposed?

Hillary and Putin RussiaWhile then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton decided whether to allow the sale of a company holding 20 percent of America’s uranium capacity to the Russian government, tens of millions of uranium investor dollars were received by the Clinton Foundation – not to mention a $500,000 speaking fee received by Bill Clinton from a Kremlin-affiliated bank.