Media skewing its Dakota Pipeline coverage

Friday, December 9, 2016
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Dakota Access protestEven though critics believe that there may reasons for negative opinions toward the Dakota Access Pipeline, one expert on the matter insists that they have nothing to do with Native American groups and other opponents.

Julia Seymour of the Media Research Center looked at broadcast news coverage following the Army Corps of Engineers' recent announcement that it would not grant the final easement needed to allow construction for the pipeline to cross Lake Oahe and the Missouri River.

"It would actually be an underground crossing," Seymour told OneNewsNow. "What I found was that ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news reports were heavily skewed in favor of the NO DAPL protestors."

She then gave a number of examples.

"It showed them positively jubilant, singing, crying, embracing one another following the decision -- and directly interviewed or included video of eight people against the pipeline," Seymour explained. "One of those was an Instagram video from actor and activist Mark Ruffalo – but not a single video or interview was included criticizing the decision, complaining that this is a violation of the rule of law, or advocating for the pipeline in any way."

Seymour, Julia (MRC)The problem, according to Seymour, is that when the media only shows that and it don't bother telling its audience the facts involved, viewers do not get the entire story.

"This pipeline does not cross the Standing Rock Sioux reservation at all, and federal courts have rejected claims that the tribe wasn't consulted," the expert on media and reporting explains. "These are important pieces of information, but instead, we've found such one-side coverage on this subject, and I think that's really affecting the public opinion of what's going on."

The Standing Rock Sioux tribe and other groups insist that the pipeline threatens water and historical sites, a claim that supporters of the pipeline have rejected.

This analysis – which involved December 4th and 5th broadcast news coverage – follows similar research conducted by Seymour.

"The 8-0 ratio in this case was even more biased than my earlier analysis, which looked at late October through mid-November pipeline coverage where I found seven times more opponents of the Dakota Access Pipeline than I found proponents."

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

If you were to give President Trump high marks in particular areas of policy, what areas would they be?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

With eyes on midterms, Trump embraces immigration fight
Trump administration pulls US out of UN human rights council
Trump, GOP leaders strain for migrant-kids solution
5 charged in 'smuggling scheme' after fatal crash in Texas
Army boots West Point grad who touted communist revolt
S. Korea: Joint U.S. drills suspended to aid talks with North
China hopes for implementation of NKorea-U.S. summit outcome

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump huddles with House GOP on immigration as border outrage escalates
Strzok escorted out of FBI, but remains on job
Colorado governor bars state funds from being used for separation of illegal immigrant families
AG Sessions: Trump knows religious freedom is a right, not a policy preference
Ann Coulter: Migrant kids at border are 'actors'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day

REASON & COMPANY

NEXT STORY
Obama inflicted 'incalculable damage' on Democrats

ABarack Obama 1ccording to a renowned American syndicated columnist, President Barack Obama has caused the Democratic Party “incalculable damage” during his two terms in the White House.