Election 2016: Mainstream media proved itself disconnected

Monday, November 14, 2016
 | 
Steve Jordahl (OneNewsNow.com)

newspaper rolled upIn the wake of an unprecedented presidential election season, the role of the mainstream media – and its treatment of the unexpected victor during the campaign – is being closely examined.

Something happened to the vaunted mainstream media world of Edward R. Murrow, Walter Cronkite, and Peter Jennings on the "Road to the White House" in 2016: it became irrelevant. Dan Gainor of Media Research Center says it has been replaced by social media.

"People trust what is referred to them on Facebook by friends and family a lot more than they trust traditional media," he begins.

Even his opponents were forced to admit that Donald Trump had such a large Twitter following that he was able to control the message about his campaign despite being the target of an admittedly hostile media.

Gainor says this may have been the first truly digital-age election, but it won't be the last. "It will be a new era dawning four years from now," he offers. "This is a rapidly moving field. Twitter just had its tenth anniversary. Facebook a little bit before that."

And when The New York Times and other major media outlets decided they were so important that they just simply could not, in good conscience, cover this election fairly, Gainor says they failed to see that they were shouting into the empty space left when their former audiences fled to the new digital frontier.

Gainor

"The new reality is we're divided up in a way mass media no longer means the 'masses' it used to," he explains. "And the major media, that means they're not the ones in charge of what we think."

The Times was roundly criticized by conservative media watchers following its public confession about its plan to report on Trump unfairly. But was "The Gray Lady" listening? Late Friday, NYT publisher Arthur Sulzberger wrote a letter to readers in which he implied the newspaper was changing direction – he used the phrase "turned on a dime" – and rededicating itself to "report America and world honestly, without fear or favor ...."

According to Joe Concha at The Hill, a review of the NYT's website on Sunday proved that declaration "to be hilariously hollow":

"... When it's impossible to find one headline out of 19 on the [New York Times'] homepage that can be deemed positive [about Trump], that shows without ambiguity the Times has no plans to be remotely balanced any time soon."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Which upcoming event will have the greatest bearing on your vote for president?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump picks conservative Amy Coney Barrett for Supreme Court
Israel to hold US-mediated talks with Lebanon on sea border
Thousands of Israelis protest in Jerusalem, despite lockdown
Scores arrested in protest against Belarus’ president
Yom Kippur synagogue attack leaves German Jews still uneasy
Ukraine plane crash death toll rises to 26, with 1 survivor

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Biden says Senate should not act on Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination until after election
Amy Coney Barrett: I love the United States and Constitution
The backlash is intense after left-wing author suggests Amy Coney Barrett adopted Haitian children to shield herself from accusations of racism
Atlanta activist spent $200G in Black Lives Matter donations on house, personal expenses: FBI
Trump set to announce Barrett as Supreme Court pick, as Dems vow to fight

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
A compliment, and a warning, for 'Hacksaw Ridge'

"Hacksaw Ridge" stillA veteran movie critic is calling a film currently showing in theaters one of the most Christian-themed films of all-time.