It's difficult to quantify the value of lost speech, says ADF

Thursday, January 14, 2021
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Bible with American flag 1The Supreme Court is mulling over a case involving a college graduate who was not allowed to share his faith.

Tuesday, January 12, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court heard the case of Chike Uzuegbunam and Joseph Bradford -- two students who were stopped by Georgia Gwinnett College officials from sharing their faith publicly on campus in the summer of 2016. (See earlier One News Now story.)

"First, they said I could only speak in the two tiny speech zones, and only then at prescribed times and with a reservation," Chike Uzuegbunam told reporters yesterday in a media call hosted by his attorneys at Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). "Later, when I was standing in the speech zone I had reserved, I was told I could not speak at all, and all I wanted to do was share the good news of Jesus Christ and how He offers us eternal life freely."

Officials later changed their policies and claimed that was enough to end the students' lawsuit, even though the officials never did anything to remedy the past free-speech violations.

Bursch

"College officials clearly violated Chike's rights," claims ADF attorney John Bursch in an op-ed published on The Hill's website. "But the district court allowed them to get away with it, dismissing the case because the policy was revoked and because Chike had graduated, after spending his final semesters of college banned from sharing his faith as he desired."

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit agreed with the district court.

Chike Uzuegbunam is seeking nominal damages.

"Nominal damages redress a constitutional injury when a plaintiff is unable or does not want to put a dollar figure on a lost right, and we need nominal damages awards to ensure that our rights are scrupulously observed," writes Bursch. "If citizens cannot obtain meaningful redress when the government acts unlawfully, our rights will be violated more frequently. A right that cannot be enforced is no right at all."

Waggoner

"It is difficult to quantify the value of lost speech," ADF attorney Kristen Waggoner told reporters in the media call. "Chike will never get those days back, and he will never have the opportunity to speak to those students in the student plaza again. You can't put an easy price tag on that."

Over two dozen groups, including the American Center for Law and Justice, the Christian Legal Society, the American Humanist Association, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), have filed amicus briefs supporting Chike Uzuegbunam and Joseph Bradford.

The case is known as Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What best describes how you expect the economy will fare during a Biden/Harris administration?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump to leave Washington on morning of Biden's inauguration
  Transgender athletes believe Biden will be their ally
Will Biden put out the welcome mat for Honduran migrants?
US executes Virginia mass murderer
Dutch government resigns over child welfare scandal
Billionaire conservative patron Adelson buried in Jerusalem

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Goya CEO says economic shutdowns were politically motivated: 'It killed our spirit'
Antifa protester confirms he posed as Trump supporter
Did CNN accidentally prove that Trump did NOT call for violence at the Capitol?
Are we all ‘domestic terrorists’?
Capitol riots followed Dems who 'normalized and encouraged violence'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Pro-lifers praise court ruling on access to abortion pill

Mifeprex (RU486)In a ruling related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled late Tuesday that pregnant women must make an in-person visit with a doctor before obtaining a chemical abortion pill.