'Buffer zone' blocks out Constitution

Wednesday, December 9, 2020
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

First Amendment attackThe Supreme Court may soon decide whether to take up a case involving Pittsburgh's "buffer zone" law.

Attorney Elissa Graves of Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), the law firm representing the 40 Days for Life campaign, says the core of this case is that the right to free speech is for everyone, not just for those in power.

"The government cannot silence speakers just because it doesn't like what they say," Graves continues. "But that’s what the city of Pittsburgh is trying to do. It has created this 30-foot diameter buffer zone where sidewalk counselors cannot speak to women outside of the Pittsburgh Planned Parenthood."

That, says Graves, is unconstitutional.

Graves

"Pittsburgh allows others to speak face-to-face in this zone because it deems their expression social or random in nature," Graves details. "The city has even said that they can speak about the weather, they can talk about the Pittsburgh Steelers, and the escorts are free to speak to women entering and exiting the facility, but they often will block sidewalk counselors from speaking to the women going in, or they'll talk over them. So it seems as that the only one-on-one conversation that is prohibited is sidewalk counseling."

The ADF attorney notes that the Supreme Court held in 2014 that a 35-foot buffer zone in Massachusetts was unconstitutional. That decision, however, applies only to the Massachusetts law.

Comments will be temporarily unavailable. Thank you for your patience as we restore this service!

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Are elections in your state well-protected against voter fraud – or is election reform needed?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Chamber of Commerce seeks end to Biden anti-work incentive
Texas becomes the latest state to fight election fraud
It's confirmed...major plunge in California population numbers
Police: 29 people recovered from semitruck in Texas
Israeli troops kill 2 Palestinian terrorists

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Dems after bad jobs report: More spending is answer
Media suddenly focused on inflation after D.C. spending spree
NY AG: 'Net neutrality' comments to FCC faked
White House admits it tries to keep Biden from probing reporter
Cori Bush slammed for referring to mothers as 'birthing people'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Lawsuit: Governors are not the law

Trump inauguration 2A political analyst believes a recently filed federal lawsuit could significantly help resolve the disputed results in the 2020 presidential election.