Justices question standing in Obamacare case

Wednesday, November 11, 2020
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagThe U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday in the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act and someone who sat through the proceedings says the pivotal issue of standing was discussed.  

Attorneys general from Texas and other states are challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare, arguing the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act zeroed out the tax penalty in the health care law for anyone who did not purchase compliant coverage.

It was that same penalty that Supreme Court justices pointed to as a reason they upheld the controversial law.

Elizabeth Slattery of Pacific Legal Foundation says a lot of the justices, including new Justice Amy Coney Barrett, questioned the states’ standing in the case and therefore the legal right to challenge the law.

Another issue involves severability.

"I think a lot of people going into the argument expected this would be where a lot of the action was at," says Slattery. "Because I think Chief Justice Roberts and Justice [Brett] Kavanaugh expressed an interest in trying to sever the individual mandate from the rest of the statute, which I think a lot of people predicted that's where they might be."

Various news outlets picked up on that issue, too: Fox News reported the justices were "suspicious of GOP challenge to Obamacare."

New York Post reported that Justices Roberts and Kavanaugh signaled "hesitance to strike down Obamacare."

"It is a risky business to guess and make predictions about how the Supreme Court is going to rule, particularly based on oral arguments," warns Slattery. "After the oral arguments in the first Obamacare case, NFIB v Sebelius, it did seem like that challengers were likely to win, and they did win to a certain extent on the commerce clause issue."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

On a Thanksgiving dinner table, the best meat to put on my plate is…

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Iran newspaper: Strike Haifa if Israel killed scientist
Suspected terrorists kill at least 40 farmers in Nigeria
Afghan officials say 34 killed in separate suicide bombings
High court takes up census case, as other count issues loom
Black Friday sees record online as US shoppers stay home
Ethiopia declares victory as military takes Tigray capital

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Ronna McDaniel urges Georgia Republicans to vote in Senate runoffs, not 'lose your faith'
Sidney Powell: Dominion contracts warrant criminal probe
USS Nimitz to Gulf as Iran war threat grows
Pennsylvania high court rejects lawsuit challenging election
Affidavit in Sidney Powell's suit claims evidence ties vote machines to Iran, China

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Trump legal team poised for SCOTUS after appellate loss in Pa.

Supreme Court sunriseAfter the federal appeals court summarily rejected President Donald Trump’s lawsuit contending that Pennsylvania’s presidential election was rife with fraud, his legal team declared it is now poised to take its case to the United States Supreme Court.