Dems dismiss them but affidavits mean something to courts

Wednesday, November 11, 2020
 | 
Billy Davis (OneNewsNow.com)

Vote Here (sign)The Trump campaign claims it has obtained a stack of signed affidavits from witnesses alleging voter fraud, and a former prosecutor says such legal evidence should not be dismissed out of hand as politics.  

Speaking on Monday at a White House press conference, the one that Fox News cut away from, RNC chair Ronna McDaniel told reporters the campaign has obtained 131 affidavits and more than 2,800 incident reports since Election Day.

“As you guys can understand,” she told reporters, “with 2,800 incident reports, this is a lot to track down. It means we're interviewing these people, we're getting their statements, and we're turning them into affidavits. But that takes a lot of time and effort.”

Hamilton

Regarding those affidavits, former assistant district attorney Abraham Hamilton III says an affidavit is considered “testimonial evidence” that is allowed in court.

“An affidavit is testimonial evidence reduced to writing,” he tells OneNewsNow. “When witnesses provide affidavits, they do so under penalty of perjury.”

Hamilton, who prosecuted criminals in the New Orleans area and in Houston, Texas, is currently general counsel at the Mississippi-based American Family Association, the parent organization of American Family News, which operates OneNewsNow.

“For anyone to assert that testimonial evidence, including testimonial evidence presented in writing via affidavits, is not evidence,” Hamilton advises, “they are either intentionally duplicitous or they are ignorant concerning legal evidence.”

Judge banging gavel 2Yet reporters at the Monday press conference seemed to do just that.

Trading turns at the microphone, McDaniel and press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said eyewitness allegations include poll workers back-dating ballots; poll workers wearing pro-Biden apparel; poll workers coaching voters to vote for Biden; state officials allowing Democrat-heavy counties to perform early voting; poll workers intimidating poll watchers; voters allowed to “cure” ballots to help Democrats; and poll workers allowing voters to vote in person after they received an absentee ballot.  

“Do you have any evidence,” a reporter then asked McDaniel, “that you can show us today that shows that illegal votes were cast?”

“I think I just went though that with you,” McDaniel replied, “with somebody backdating ballots. That’s called illegal.”

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

On a Thanksgiving dinner table, the best meat to put on my plate is…

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

High court takes up census case, as other count issues loom
Black Friday sees record online as US shoppers stay home
Ethiopia declares victory as military takes Tigray capital
Iran’s supreme leader vows revenge over slain scientist
Clashes with cleric’s supporters kill 5 in southern Iraq
Los Angeles orders more restrictions as coronavirus surges

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Pennsylvania high court rejects lawsuit challenging election
Affidavit in Sidney Powell's suit claims evidence ties vote machines to Iran, China
Former House Republican wrests California seat from Dem incumbent
GOP's House wins show some Dem voters 'connecting the dots' on liberal left, lawmaker says
Carter Page sues FBI, DOJ, and individuals behind FISA abuse

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Trump legal team poised for SCOTUS after appellate loss in Pa.

Supreme Court sunriseAfter the federal appeals court summarily rejected President Donald Trump’s lawsuit contending that Pennsylvania’s presidential election was rife with fraud, his legal team declared it is now poised to take its case to the United States Supreme Court.