Atheist pushing county to discriminate

Tuesday, October 13, 2020
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Nativity paintingOral argument is set for a federal appeals court case over a nativity scene that a nonprofit litigation organization dedicated to advancing religious freedom maintains is a constitutional display.

Liberty Counsel filed its reply brief last week at the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, refuting the opinion by an Indiana federal judge who ruled against the nativity scene display at the Jackson County Courthouse.

"An individual read an article or heard something on the news that this atheist organization objected, and so she was contacted or she got in communication with this atheist organization and had never visited this location where the nativity scene was located," reports Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel. "So she went down there one time, specifically for the purpose of visiting this location and then becoming a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit."

The nativity scene has been featured for many years and is part of a broader display that includes non-Christian symbols of the Christmas holiday.

The case could go to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"The precedent is quite clear already; this is a constitutional display," Staver continues. "You can have the government putting up a display on property regarding the holiday which also includes the nativity scene. In fact, to leave out the nativity scene as part of a holiday display would be blatant discrimination against the Christian viewpoint."

Staver

Indiana Southern District Judge Tanya Walton Pruitt ruled against the nativity scene on April 29 and ordered Jackson County to pay attorney fees and other expenses for Rebecca Woodring, the plaintiff in the federal lawsuit.

According to The Indiana Lawyer, Woodring is an atheist who believes government should not be involved in religious activity.

The nativity scene in question was purchased by Brownstown Ministerial Association and maintained by the local Lions Club. The county pays for the electricity.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

The biggest highlight from the final presidential debate was…(Pick up to two)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Trump, Biden scrap on oil, virus with just over a week to go
  Trump campaign sues in Nevada to stop Vegas-area vote count
  Some hospitals in crisis as US nears high for COVID-19 cases
  Asteroid samples escaping from jammed NASA spacecraft
  Arnold Schwarzenegger feels 'fantastic' after heart surgery
Cheerful Trump hits the trail, Biden tries debate cleanup
GOP marches ahead on Barrett over Democrats' blockade

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump calls Biden's 'transition from' oil comments 'perhaps most shocking admission ever made'
Oops: Photograph of Joe Biden and Hunter's business partner found on Burisma's website
Black community outraged after California cop shoots and kills a black man, but cellphone video shows he was pulling a gun
At final presidential debate Biden offers stunning misunderstanding of how economy actually works
College exempts 500-person Black Lives Matter protest from 10-person COVID rules

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
FRC to tech firm: We are not 'hate group'

MobileCause websiteFamily Research Council is fighting back weeks after a tech company dropped a contract with the conservative group due to its “hate group” status with the Southern Poverty Law Center.