Biden links end of Obamacare with COVID-19

Tuesday, June 30, 2020
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

ObamaCare comment web pageJoe Biden is warning that people could lose their health insurance in a U.S. Supreme Court case but an analyst points out the Obama-Biden administration wrecked coverage for millions. 

The case involves the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or “Obamacare.”

At issue is whether the controversial health care law can stand after Congress and President Trump zeroed out the tax penalty for Americans not having health insurance via the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

Critics of the Affordable Care Act are optimistic the justices will strike down the health care law, given that Chief Justice John Roberts upheld the law based on the tax penalty in a decision that was heavily criticized at the time.

Biden, meanwhile, says people with COVID-19 should not lose their health insurance because it could be viewed as a pre-existing condition, and the ACA was created to help people get coverage even if they have a pre-existing condition.

"Biden is implying that insurance companies would drop people with coverage and they can't do that," advises Merrill Matthews, Ph.D. of the Institute for Policy Innovation (IPI). "Prior to the law, insurance companies could not drop you just because you had a medical condition, and that was virtually true of all states and the federal plans as well.”

Matthews points out that "millions” of Americans lost their own health insurance coverage because of the Affordable Care Act, which cancelled those plans if they failed to meet the requirements in the new law. 

Merrill's wife was among the people that lost their health insurance as a result of the ACA, he tells OneNewsNow.

The earliest the Supreme Court could take up the latest case would be October when the next term is scheduled to begin.

If that happens, a decision from the justices may not come until May or June of 2021.

Republican leaders in Congress should anticipate that court decision next year, Merrill adds, so it’s “imperative” that they come up with a popular plan to replace it after fighting Obamacare since it became law.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Is it important to link Black Lives Matter with its ‘trained Marxist’ co-founders?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

1 of 2 protesters hit by car on closed Seattle highway dies
2 dead, 8 hurt in South Carolina nightclub shooting
Crunch, crunch: Africa’s locust outbreak is far from over
For nation’s birthday, Trump slams the enemies within
Kansas newspaper's post equates mask mandate with Holocaust
Heavy rain floods southern Japan; over a dozen presumed dead

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Portland police declare ‘riot’ again – as city sees 38th straight day of unrest
Chicago erupts in July 4 gunfire -- with girl, 7, and boy, 14, among those killed
Columbus statue toppled by Baltimore protesters
Trump defends US history, blasts 'radical left' in 'Salute to America' celebration
At UN Human Rights Council, 53 countries back China's draconian Hong Kong crackdown

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Churches find fairness in the law

gavel with Bible 1A federal judge ruled on Friday that New York's restrictions on church services could not be enforced while the state encouraged unrestricted Black Lives Matter protests -- upholding the rights of religious leaders who were discriminated against in The Empire State.