Judge Sullivan's misjudging his role

Friday, June 5, 2020
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Lady of JusticeAs the D.C. Circuit has scheduled oral arguments to review a judge's refusal to immediately close the federal government's prosecution of Michael Flynn, one legal fellow says he's never seen anything like this before.

The Department of Justice has already moved to drop its case against Flynn, a former national security adviser to President Trump. Still, Judge Emmet Sullivan has been reluctant to sign off on the dismissal. He has more recently obtained legal counsel, and Sullivan stated this week that there is reason to question the DOJ's motives.

Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow for The Heritage Foundation, tells OneNewsNow Judge Sullivan has no legal basis to do that.

"In fact, the Justice Department filed a brief in response to what Judge Sullivan filed with the court of appeals, and they pointed out that not only is he wrong under the federal rules of criminal procedure that govern him, he's wrong under the law and the Constitution," says Spakovsky, who worked previously at the Justice Department as counsel to the assistant attorney general for civil rights.

von Spakovsky, Hans (Heritage)"The reason is very simple," he continues. "The executive branch enforces our laws and decides whether to prosecute or not. The judicial branch has no role as a prosecutor, and that is exactly what Judge Sullivan is attempting."

In terms of Judge Sullivan getting a lawyer, Spakovsky has never seen anything like this before.

"It is bizarre what he has done," the legal fellow submits. "The judge is just completely wrong in all of this."

The legal fellow adds that the worst part is "we the taxpayers are paying the cost of Judge Sullivan's lawyer."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What is obvious from the alleged behavior of the New York Times editorial staff?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

China summons US ambassador, says US blocks its development
Jewish leaders condemn 'hurtful' words by Nick Cannon
Biden, Gates, other Twitter accounts hacked in Bitcoin scam
NASCAR hosts largest sporting event crowd since pandemic
ASU, NCAA sued over death of linebacker found to have CTE
Walmart will force all customers to wear masks
Feds bring terrorism charges in latest MS-13 gang crackdown

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Breaking: President Trump demotes Brad Parscale from role as 2020 campaign manager
National Association of Police Organizations endorses Trump, after backing Biden as VP in '08, '12
Fmr. ODNI Chief Grenell: Intel ignored sources opposing Steele document
Gun purchases set record high in June
NYC protesters bloody police officers during protest

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Biden links end of Obamacare with COVID-19

ObamaCare comment web pageJoe Biden is warning that people could lose their health insurance in a U.S. Supreme Court case but an analyst points out the Obama-Biden administration wrecked coverage for millions.