'Horrible opinion' against churches isn't final

Wednesday, June 3, 2020
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. Supreme CourtA religious freedom law firm remains hopeful that the Supreme Court will hear a case involving state limits on attendance at worship services.

Recently on "The Todd Starnes Show," Kelly Shackelford of First Liberty Institute and Starnes were discussing the Supreme Court's rejection of a California church's emergency appeal challenging state limits on attendance at worship services due to government concerns about COVID-19.

Chief Justice John Roberts was the deciding vote against the emergency appeal, but Shackelford is optimistic for a Supreme Court case.

"The bad thing was not just he didn't vote in favor of the church, but he said some things that were highly disturbing that, again, this is in a very unique kind of appeal," said Kelly Schackelford. "He said things like, 'We're an unelected judiciary; we cannot second guess the policy makers’' and said a number of things that, in the context of fundamental First Amendment rights, that is their job to question the policy makers."

Shackelford

While the decision is not final, Shackelford fears it could be misinterpreted as well as misused to attack churches, "not only in this situation, but in the future if we can't get this thing turned around."

Shackelford went on to point out that Chief Justice Roberts has "actually been very good on religious freedom."

"I think what threw him off is the fact of how it arrived and the timing of everything," he continued. "Our goal at First Liberty is to get a case up to the Supreme Court before all this is over to hopefully begin to wipe out and clean up this horrible opinion that came down Friday night as far as what Justice Kavanaugh had to say."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What is obvious from the alleged behavior of the New York Times editorial staff?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

China summons US ambassador, says US blocks its development
Jewish leaders condemn 'hurtful' words by Nick Cannon
Biden, Gates, other Twitter accounts hacked in Bitcoin scam
NASCAR hosts largest sporting event crowd since pandemic
ASU, NCAA sued over death of linebacker found to have CTE
Walmart will force all customers to wear masks
Feds bring terrorism charges in latest MS-13 gang crackdown

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Breaking: President Trump demotes Brad Parscale from role as 2020 campaign manager
National Association of Police Organizations endorses Trump, after backing Biden as VP in '08, '12
Fmr. ODNI Chief Grenell: Intel ignored sources opposing Steele document
Gun purchases set record high in June
NYC protesters bloody police officers during protest

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Biden links end of Obamacare with COVID-19

ObamaCare comment web pageJoe Biden is warning that people could lose their health insurance in a U.S. Supreme Court case but an analyst points out the Obama-Biden administration wrecked coverage for millions.