A case to strengthen parental rights

Tuesday, February 25, 2020
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

gavel with U.S. flagNext month, the Texas Supreme Court will begin hearing a case to decide whether a little girl's deceased mother's boyfriend or the child's father should have custody of her.

Rob Henneke of Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF), an organization that filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of the biological father in this case, says the issue is the protection of the presumption of fitness in a parent in opposing a custody suit by a non-parent.

The mother of the female child was never married to the biological father.

"The dad was the only living parent of the baby. But in this situation, the boyfriend of the mom, who had been living with the mom for approximately ten months, sued for custody," Henneke continues. "In Texas, you are allowed to sue for custody if you have possession of a minor for at least six months. But in this situation, you had a fit parent, the father, who took the baby in when the mother died."

A lower court judge gave joint custody to the biological father and the mother's boyfriend. Then the Texas Supreme Court stepped in on an emergency basis and stopped joint visitation.

"At the Texas Public Policy Foundation, one of our policy focuses is through our Centers for Family and Children, and in that we advocate, among other issues, for the importance of parental rights and protecting and defending those parental rights," says Henneke. "In this case we filed the friend-of-the-court brief on the side of the biological father, urging the Texas Supreme Court to recognize that the presumption of fitness in a parent needs to apply in all situations, and that this was a case where the trial court was wrong, and that this was an opportunity for the Texas Supreme Court to strengthen constitutional protections for parents here in Texas."

Henneke

Argument is tentatively set for the week of March 24th. A decision is expected no later than June.

"Parental rights, the rights of a parent to raise and control and nurture their child -- those aren't rights given by government," Henneke says. "Those are rights that are inherent to the parent. In extreme situations, government can step in, and [it] sometimes does step in on in terms of cases involving abuse or neglect or so forth."

But as he points out, the default is the constitutional rights a parent has to his or her child, and his firm contends it is important for this case to have that recognition from the Texas Supreme Court.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

I would have more confidence in mainstream media reports about President Trump if they …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Autopsy report shows Floyd had tested positive for COVID-19
  Brees' anthem comments draw backlash from teammates, others
  Obama steps out as nation confronts confluence of crises
  MLB rejects 114-game schedule, threatens plan of about 50
  Tropical Storm Cristobal makes landfall on Mexico Gulf coast
Murder charge upgraded in Floyd case, 3 other cops charged
Nation’s streets calmest in days; police credit curfews

LATEST FROM THE WEB

George Floyd unrest: Police out in force in major cities to tamp down on riots as curfews take effect
Antifa was plotting insurgency for months
President Trump reacts after being criticized by former defense chief Jim Mattis
The left's poisoning of the educational infrastructure
White man can’t breathe

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
VA pushes 'equality' as SCOTUS agrees to review what that means

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagA religious liberty attorney says the case to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court this fall could end with a landmark ruling in the fight over LGBT rights and religious liberty.