SCOTUS asked – again – to take Christian florist's case

Monday, December 23, 2019
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Barronelle Stutzman (Christian florist)A Washington state florist is still watching and waiting for the Supreme Court to take up her high-profile case.

"She has once again asked the United States Supreme Court to consider and review a lower court decision that was against her," says attorney Greg Baylor at Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF)," the law firm representing Barronelle Stutzman. "The petition is before the Court and we're just waiting for them to receive all of the briefing and then move ahead with deciding whether or not to take the case."

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Washington state attorney general claim Stutzman is guilty of unlawful discrimination for declining to use her creative skills to celebrate the same-sex "wedding" ceremony of her longtime customer, Robert Ingersol.

Baylor

Her attorney explains that Stutzman is a Christian who believes in traditional marriage and who "serves all people, including people who identify as homosexual – but she's unwilling to assist, participate, help celebrate a same-sex wedding ceremony."

Federal legislation from Representative Chris Stewart (R-Utah) aims to satisfy the LGBTQ community and people with religious freedom concerns. However, the ACLU says the so-called "Freedom For All Act" does not protect LGBTQ people.

Meanwhile, Alliance Defending Freedom says that legislation doesn't protect Stutzman from the Washington state law from which she has been prosecuted. "Fairness for All is not a solution for Barronelle – and the problem is Fairness for All will create more circumstance like the one Barronelle has experienced," the legal firm explains.

In July 2017, ADF petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to take up Stutzman's case. In June 2018, the Court sent the case back to the Washington Supreme Court, after vacating that court's decision and instructing it to reconsider her lawsuit in light of the decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.

In June 2019, the Washington Supreme Court ruled against Stutzman a second time. ADF attorneys have once again asked the U.S. Supreme Court to take her case.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What are your greatest concerns about restrictions being placed on in-person worship services?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Ex-FBI lawyer to plead guilty to lying in Russia probe
9th Circuit ends California ban on high-capacity magazines
3 Mississippi police officers facing murder charges
Trump denounces Biden call for mask mandate
Federal judge upholds New York's COVID quarantine
US retail sales rise for 3rd month

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Using face masks is still a good idea -- mandating them isn't
America's race reality: Inhuman, insane, incoherent
Tennessee department of education orders Orwellian 'wellbeing' checks for kids from birth to age 18
Fairfax County, Virginia public schools tell parents not to hire tutors because it is 'unfair' to kids whose parents can’t afford them
Yale discriminated by race in undergraduate admissions, Justice Department says

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
LA law seeks to take care of women

gavel with U.S. flagAn observer who has his eye on a particular Supreme Court case says the New Year will bring plenty of legal disputes.