Supremes rule on lawsuit over firearm purchased online

Wednesday, November 27, 2019
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagA Second Amendment advocate is pleased with a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that upholds a pro-gun decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

The case stems from the 2012 shooting at a spa in suburban Milwaukee in which three people were murdered and four others wounded. The perpetrator later killed himself.

The shooter was under a court order prohibiting him from possessing guns but purchased a pistol and ammunition from someone he met through website Armslist.com. One of the shooting victims sued the website but the Wisconsin Supreme Court dismissed the suit, ruling that federal law protects website operators from liability for posting content from a third party.

The state court rejected arguments that websites that enable gun deals must take reasonable care to prevent sales to people prohibited from purchasing firearms.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the decision.

Mike Hammond, legislative counsel to Gun Owners of America, says the high court described a “chilling effect” on the First Amendment and Second Amendment if websites were required to rigorously screen every gun-related issue that came within their purview.

Hammond says he has bad news for anyone who suggests that a person prohibited from obtaining a firearm will not find a way to get one.

“Most of the people who commit crimes in America with firearms are prohibited people,” he says, “and yet they have no problem obtaining fire arms."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What was the most revealing revelation from the Senate hearing on the inspector general’s report? (Choose up to two)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  House panel presses toward historic Trump impeachment vote
  Crash shines light on immigrants in Christmas tree workforce
  UK exit poll suggests majority for Johnson's Conservatives
  10 ex-NFL players charged with defrauding healthcare program
  US water chief praises Colorado River deal, sees challenges
Official: Jersey City attack was 'fueled' by anti-Semitism
US puts hold on new foreign military students

LATEST FROM THE WEB

House panel to hold key impeachment vote, after day of all-out sparring and intrigue
Cory Booker didn't qualify for the next Dem debate, but still says he has a 'path to victory'
Dems deliver how-to lesson in 'quid pro quo' ... on guns
Impeachment markup heats up as Nadler says 'we cannot rely on an election' to oust Trump
Ben Sasse causes liberal implosion on social media after he admits FISA abuse accusations were true

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Liberalism could 'come back and bite' seminary

Fuller Theological SeminaryA legal defense organization specializing in the defense of religious freedom says a lesbian's lawsuit against Fuller Theological Seminary in southern California could set a dangerous precedent.