It's good to see a principled judiciary

Friday, November 8, 2019
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

judge banging gavel 1Democrats may be trying to impeach him or beat him in next year's election, but one thing is certain: President Trump will have had a lasting impact on the federal judiciary.

"The judges he's nominating, as a group, they are the best group we've ever had," thinks Phillip Jauregui, president of Judicial Action Group. "There will be a tremendous number of them, and, of course, we already have two Supreme Court justices, and I think the odds are he'll get … additional seats on the Supreme Court."

Jauregui is not alone in his opinion. In an op-ed for FoxNews.com, Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) writes these new judges are principled constitutionalists who have demonstrated excellence and professionalism throughout their legal careers.

Still, Jauregui has concerns about two judicial nominees.

"One is Halil Suleyman Ozerden to the Fifth Circuit, and the other is Patrick Bumatay to the Ninth Circuit," says Jauregui. "There have been other presidents, Republican presidents, President Reagan for example, that made some mistakes. So this isn't taking a shot at President Trump, [as] I think he is a great president and has done a great job. But there are some nominees that are very, very concerning and I'd like to see stopped."

American Family Association is opposed to Ozerden, even going so far as to flat-out urge citizens to tell their senators not to confirm him.

In an Action Alert to its supporters, AFA reports that Ozerden, a district judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, refused to hear the complaint of the Catholic Diocese of Biloxi, whose leaders said the ObamaCare contraceptive mandate violated their religious liberty and their deeply-held religious belief in the sanctity of human life.

Jauregui

"We certainly don't want senators just being a rubber stamp," Jauregui continues. "The Senate has a role in confirming and giving their consent to these nominees, and so it's important for the senators to hear from their constituents that they're looking to them to really give a good review on these nominees, to do their research, and to make sure that these are going to be great judges for the future."

The Judicial Action Group president continues to point out that a judge does not serve a two-year, four-year, or a six-year term like a senator; they can serve for 50 years. And that is why it is so important for senators to get it right.

At least 158 federal judges have been confirmed by the Senate, and more nominations are being considered.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Your reaction to the positive job numbers released on Friday?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Biden formally clinches Democratic presidential nomination
Facebook removes nearly 200 accounts tied to hate groups
Barr says he didn’t give tactical order to clear protesters
Citing jobs, Trump claims victory over virus, econ collapse
Black cops feel pain of Floyd's death, duty to their uniform

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Pete Hegseth blasts DC mayor, says National Guard prevented desecration of monuments
Jeff Sessions shuts down Ilhan Omar in Twitter spat, then asks: 'How's your brother, by the way?'
California Gov. Newsom wants to set use-of-force standard
Drew Brees sends a message to President Trump about his comments on kneeling protests
Maxine Waters freaks out: Remove Trump 'before this would-be dictator takes us all down'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Supremes rule on lawsuit over firearm purchased online

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagA Second Amendment advocate is pleased with a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that upholds a pro-gun decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.