'Civil liberties' group shrugs off doctors' beliefs

Monday, October 21, 2019
 | 
Chris Woodward, John Rosemond (OneNewsNow.com)

hospital heart monitor surgeryThanks to a federal court ruling, surgeons will be allowed to follow their conscience and not be forced to use their skills against their will.

The lawsuit Franciscan Alliance v. Azar was filed over a 2016 federal regulation that threatened to drive doctors out of practice if they would not perform gender-transition procedures on patients, including children.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor for the Northern District of Texas struck down the rule, giving organizations such as Franciscan Alliance and Christian Medical Association a legal victory.

"It's just so far off base with the professional code, hypocritic oath, so we are delighted with this ruling," says Dr. Mike Chupp, CEO of Christian Medical Association.

Becket, the law firm representing the plaintiffs, says science and medicine warn of “significant risks” that include heart conditions and loss of bone density, and increased cancer risk.

“But studies show that children with gender dysphoria found that fewer than one in four children referred for gender dysphoria continued to experience that condition into adulthood," Becket said in a statement.

The religious liberty law firm also argued that a panel of medical experts assembled by the government warned about the dangers and advised against covering the medical procedures through Medicare and Medicaid.

"Our main opponent in this case is the ACLU," Becket attorney Luke Goodrich tells OneNewsNow.

Hippocratic Oath“We expect that they will probably try to appeal this ruling and may also try to file lawsuits in other jurisdictions,” he says, “but one thing we know for sure is that this issue is not going away.”

According to Goodrich, doctors do not have to check their beliefs at the door and, in fact, he points out that many doctors were inspired by their faith to enter medical school with the goal of helping others.

Meanwhile, Dr. Chupp predicts the ruling will be appealed by the ACLU.

"It was ruled that HHS, because they had to change their position under a new administration, wasn't able to defend the old regulation as ardently,” he explains. “And so the ACLU has been allowed by the judge to intervene."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

FEATURED PODCAST

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why is the Democratic establishment so worried that Bernie Sanders may become their nominee?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Worried Democrats rush to slow front-runner Sanders
Dow drops over 1,000 as outbreak threatens global economy
Generational split among SC black voters could hurt Biden
Victims turn to media to expose sex abuse by college doctors
Public memorial service remembers the private Kobe Bryant
US appeals court upholds Trump rules involving abortions
Justices to hear Philly dispute over same-sex foster parents

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos calls out AOC's hypocrisy on school choice
Trump administration asks Congress for $2.5B to combat coronavirus
Liberal Ninth Circuit upholds Trump admin's rules on abortion funding
Greyhound to stop allowing Border Patrol immigration checks on buses
Public school launches secret program to turn kids 'trans' without telling parents

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
ABA ripped for 'Not Qualified' attack on nominee

Lawrence VanDykeThe American Bar Association (ABA) is being accused of a political hit job over a judicial nominee who broke down in tears during a congressional hearing.