Mayor of 1 million demands de facto gun ban

Tuesday, August 20, 2019
 | 
Chris Woodward, Billy Davis (OneNewsNow.com)

San Jose crime sceneThe mayor of a California city is proposing a controversial ordinance: require his constituents to carry liability insurance if they own a firearm, and even consent to searches of their homes. 

San Jose’s mayor Sam Liccardo is proposing that gun owners acquire liability insurance or pay a fee to cover taxpayers’ costs, such as emergency room care, that is associated with “firearm violence,” The Mercury News newspaper reported.

“Gun ownership is an inherently dangerous activity,” Liccardo told reporters.

San Jose, a city of approximately 1 million, is not safe, either: Mercury News reported in a January story that robberies, aggravated assaults, and burglaries caused a spike in crime rates in recent years.

Mayor Liccardo says he is taking action after a gunman armed with an AK-47-style rifle opened fire at the annual Gilroy Garlic Festival on July 28, killing three people and wounding several others.

Gottlieb

Gilroy is located approximately 35 miles south of San Jose.

Alan Gottlieb of Second Amendment Foundation says the mayor’s push for liability insurance is a sneaky attempt to restrict gun ownership, since the mayor must know that insurance companies won’t write a policy for firearms in the home.

“And then nobody can own a gun. That's what they're doing,” he alleges. “It's a backdoor way in for a gun prohibition."

Second Amendment (gun + flag)The push for liability insurance is not new, Gottlieb tells OneNewsNow, because anti-gun activists have introduced it at the state level and also in some cities.

According to the Mercury News story, Liccardo is also calling for sales taxes on firearms and ammunition; wants cash rewards to residents who turn in people who “unlawfully obtained” firearms; and wants the city to “explore” a program in which San Jose residents willingly allow law enforcement to search their homes for firearms.

According to Gottlieb, what San Jose is proposing is a de facto gun ban that means law-abiding citizens will lose their 2nd Amendment right to protect their families inside their own homes.

The criminals, meanwhile, he adds, don’t care about laws and don't take out an insurance policy. 

 

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Should the United States use military force against Iran after it attacked Saudi Arabia?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

More than 1,000 rescues, evacuations as Imelda soaks Texas
Trump scores a victory in bicoastal battle over tax returns
Sanford takes his first 2020 campaign trip to New Hampshire
North Carolina university shooting suspect pleads guilty
In Israel, calls for unity reveal deep divisions after vote

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Why conservatives ignore white-hating politics
Environmental apocalypse predictions have failed for half a century
Ha! On campus of 30,000 students, less than 10 attend university’s 'white privilege' workshop
WATCH: Tucker Carlson shreds MSM for running with Trudeau's 'white privilege' apology
Idolatry: Climate crazed seminary confesses sins to plants in 'beautiful ritual'

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Judicial Watch sues over 'sanctuary' policy tied to gruesome murder

crime scene do not crossA government watchdog that pursues politicians is going after another “sanctuary city” in California.