SCOTUS says no to Ohio religious discrimination case

Wednesday, May 15, 2019
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

gavel with Bible 1The Supreme Court decided this week not to take up a case involving a claim of discrimination against a Christian school, but an attorney with the firm representing the school says the high court will have to settle this issue someday.

For eight years, Tree of Life Christian School in Ohio has been involved in a legal battle with the city of Upper Arlington, which allows other nonprofit uses in the zone where the school purchased its building but singled out Tree of Life for exclusion. Citing the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing the school told the Supreme Court that the school was prevented by the government from educating in its own building.

"The city of Upper Arlington, Ohio, is treating Tree of Life Christian Schools differently than other organizations and businesses that it would allow into the zoning district," explains attorney Erik Stanley. "So the idea there is that Tree of Life is denied under the zoning code, but other nonprofit organizations are allowed."

Stanley, Erik (ADF)That, says Stanley, is a clear violation of RLUIPA. "The Court's decision not to weigh in does not settle the issue," Stanley continues. "In fact, it leaves the issue very unsettled in the lower courts."

Prior to the case being appealed to the Supreme Court, Tree of Life lost at the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, whose jurisdiction includes four states: Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, and Kentucky. Stanley argues that if the school had been located in Florida, it probably would have won the case at the appeals court level.

"That illustrates how divided the district courts and the circuit courts are on this issue," the attorney explains. "So we were hopeful that the Court would take up this issue and resolve this split, but unfortunately this split among the lower courts is going to remain for the foreseeable future."

Tree of Life wasn't alone in its quest for justice. After ADF attorneys asked the Supreme Court to hear the case, a broad range of legal experts, education groups, and religious organizations and denominations filed friend-of-the-court briefs also asking the court to hear the case.

"… One of the nice things about our petition to the Supreme Court," Stanley adds, "is how many other groups, including non-Christian groups such as Jews, Muslims and Sikhs, had come on board and said the principle that religious groups should not be discriminated against in zoning laws is one that applies to all religions."

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What do you believe will have the greatest influence with Jewish voters in November 2020?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Hong Kong police fire tear gas, roll out water cannon trucks
N. Korea tests new ‘super-large’ multiple rocket launcher
G-7 cracks emerge on Iran as Trump contests French role
Israel says it thwarts imminent Iranian attack from Syria
Brazilian troops begin deploying to fight Amazon fires
Iranian oil tanker pursued by US says it is going to Turkey
75 years later, US World War II veterans say: Never forget

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Shooting at Maryland toddler's birthday party leaves 7 adults wounded, police say
At G7 summit, Trump offers Brexit Britain a "very Big" trade deal
US: Macron twisting G-7 to hurt Trump, win favor at home
Rashida Tlaib says Trump is ‘scared’ of her and the ‘Squad’
Six injured after lightning strike at PGA TOUR Championship

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Satanists sidestepping science for convenience

law booksSatan worshippers plan to challenge a Supreme Court decision on the remains of aborted babies.