Judge 'doing his job' in Obamacare ruling, says attorney

Tuesday, December 18, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

judge banging gavelAmericans woke up to a federal court ruling last week that all but squashed the Affordable Care Act but an attorney involved in the case says it wasn't a surprise.

Because the GOP-passed Tax Cuts and Jobs Act zeroed out the individual mandate penalty in Obamacare for not having health insurance, a federal judge has ruled all of the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional.

The individual mandate penalty is what upheld the health care law during a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court case over the controversial law in 2012.

The ruling last Friday amounts to "raw judicial activism," Nicholas Bagley, a professor of law at the University of Michigan Law School, wrote in an op-ed for The Washington Post.

"Don't for a moment mistake it for the rule of law," he claimed.

Henneke
"We need to pivot and look at opportunities for states to step up and lead. Governors and states would do a better job at addressing this than Washington, DC. This has never been a proper role for the federal government – and we would urge as this case moves through the federal courts that this now is the opportunity for the GOP and for the states to get it right, to step up, to address concerns about people being able to get coverage and care when they're sick, and to provide real solutions for Americans."

Rob Henneke, general counsel
Texas Public Policy Foundation

However, attorney Rob Henneke of Texas Public Policy Foundation says it was not judicial activism.

"Judicial activism is when the courts step in to write new laws or they twist something to get to a desired outcome," Henneke told reporters in a press call Monday. "Judge O'Connor addressed this in the first paragraph of his opinion in that his decision is based on the language of the Supreme Court's opinion and the text of the Affordable Care Act. It's not activism. It's him doing his job."

Henneke defended individuals who were co-plaintiffs in the case along with a Texas-led state coalition.

"My clients are those that have continued to be hurt by the Affordable Care Act," he continued. "They have lost a doctor of their choice. They have dealt with double-digit increases in their premiums. They've also dealt with limitations on how they can access health care even under the Affordable Care Act plan they purchased through the mandate."

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders issued a statement that predicted the ruling will be appealed to the Supreme Court and also stated the law "remains in place" pending that appeal. 


12/19/2018 - sidebar added

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

How are you feeling about the Amy Coney Barrett nomination to the Supreme Court?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Barrett confirmed as Supreme Court justice
Trump, Biden hit battleground Pennsylvania amid pandemic
100,000 in Southern California to evacuate as blaze grows
High court won't extend Wisconsin's absentee ballot deadline
Winds and rain whip Yucatan resorts as Hurricane Zeta nears

LATEST FROM THE WEB

College teaches that 'All Lives Matter' and 'Blue Lives Matter' are anti-blackness
Critical Race Theory is socialist, anti-God and anti-American
CNN, MSNBC skip historic Senate vote confirming Amy Coney Barrett to Supreme Court
7 open leftist threats that political terror is coming to America whether Trump wins or not
Destroying law and order has destroyed American cities

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Calif. denying citizens' gun rights?

Second Amendment (gun + flag)A pro-gun rights organization is joining in a lawsuit against the State of California for preventing individuals from exercising their Second Amendment rights.