Trump vs. Obamacare – it's not over till it's over

Friday, December 14, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

gavel with stethoscopeOptions remain for the Trump administration after another setback this week in its ongoing legal battle with Obamacare.

The Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) requires most companies to cover birth control at no additional cost. Exemptions are available for religious organizations, but the Trump administration wanted to allow more categories of employers – including publicly traded companies – to opt out if they have religious objections.

California argued that the change could result in millions of women in the state losing free birth-control services, leading to unintended pregnancies that would tax the state's healthcare and other social programs. A divided Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with California on Thursday.

Hamilton

So what happens now?

"The Trump administration can either choose to have the full panel of Ninth Circuit judges to hear the case, or they can go directly to the Supreme Court," answers Abraham Hamilton III, legal counsel for the American Family Association.

Should the Trump administration go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, don't expect a quick ruling from the justices, says the attorney.

"It's not likely that it would be a part of this immediate term before the Supreme Court," says Hamilton. "It would more than likely be in the next term to hear the case."

The Department of Justice said in court documents that the rules were about protecting a small group of "sincere religious and moral objectors" from having to violate their beliefs.

California's lawsuit to block the changes was joined by Delaware, Maryland, New York, and Virginia.


Editor's Note: The American Family Association is the parent organization of the American Family News Network, which operates OneNewsNow.com.

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Why is ‘drag queen story hour’ being defended even after convicted sex offenders participated? (Choose up to two)

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

  Special prosecutor named to look into Jussie Smollett case
  China announces tariff hike on $75 billion of US products
US officials confirm Israeli strike in Iraq
  Danish leader speaks with Trump amid Greenland dispute
Democrats pessimistic about "Medicare for All' plan

LATEST FROM THE WEB

How 'bout 'National Family Month'? Ideas for 2020
'I AM NOT SUICIDAL,' says man who exposed Hillary's ties to Google
Todd Starnes: Beauty queen in combat boots takes on Trump Derangement Syndrome
Why victimhood and fear won’t preserve liberty
Good grief: University banned beef because a fashion expert declared a ‘climate emergency’

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Calif. denying citizens' gun rights?

Second Amendment (gun + flag)A pro-gun rights organization is joining in a lawsuit against the State of California for preventing individuals from exercising their Second Amendment rights.