Nuns having to defend their beliefs ... again

Wednesday, October 17, 2018
 | 
Chris Woodward (OneNewsNow.com)

Little Sisters of the Poor outside courtAn order of nuns that was in the national spotlight during the Obama years is due back in federal court this week, defending their right to live according to their religious beliefs.

In State of California v. Little Sisters of the Poor, California is suing to end a 2017 regulation that gives religious nonprofits – including the order of Catholic nuns – legal protection from the Obama-era HHS mandate that employers provide health insurance coverage for contraception and abortion-causing drugs.

The new regulation is a result of the 2016 Supreme Court decision in Zubik v. Burwell, which told HHS to revise its rules. Yet shortly after the regulation was passed, Attorney General Xavier Becerra (D-California) sued to take away the Little Sisters' religious exemption, forcing the nuns back to court.

Rienzi, Mark (Becket)"We have a lot of problems in this country that can be hard to solve," says Mark Rienzi, president of Becket, the law firm representing the Little Sisters of the Poor, "but figuring out how to distribute contraceptives without nuns is not one of them."

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments on Friday and decide whether the Little Sisters of the Poor can get back to their ministry: caring for the elderly poor.

The attorney general of Pennsylvania has also challenged the regulation that provides relief to Little Sisters of the Poor.


Editor's note: Image above depicts Little Sisters of the Poor and their attorney outside the Supreme Court in 2016.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

I agree with this HHS proposal reversing the Obamacare section benefiting transgenders primarily because …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

‘We’re trapped’: Likely tornado rips through Oklahoma town
Iraq offers to mediate in crisis between its allies Iran, US
Venezuela negotiators return to Norway for crisis talks
Mike Pence: West Point grads should expect to see combat
Flooding leads to Oklahoma and Arkansas evacuations
New candidates vie to succeed UK’s May with focus on Brexit
Bolton says N. Korea missile tests violated UN resolutions

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Tornado strikes El Reno, Oklahoma; at least 2 deaths confirmed: reports
Thousands march in Hong Kong to commemorate June 4 protests
Israelis protest moves to grant Netanyahu immunity, limit Supreme Court
Video: Judge blocks part of Trump's border wall plan
Beto echoes Iranian propaganda, says Trump 'provoking another war' with troop increase

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Commission's new game: Let's get Jack

Jack Phillips (Colo. baker - concerned look)Lawyers for Jack Phillips are appealing to a federal judge after the Colorado baker has been targeted a second time by the state's Civil Rights Commission.