CIS: Congress needs to step up on 'sanctuary cities'

Friday, August 10, 2018
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

SF: Sanctuary CityAn immigration attorney says Congress needs to craft its appropriations laws more clearly in order to ensure that the Justice Department can legally withhold funds from "sanctuary" entities.

The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week that President Trump's executive order punishing sanctuary cities by withholding money is unconstitutional. Mr. Trump, said the court, tried to do Congress's job when his administration added new conditions to Justice Department grants by requiring cities and counties to cooperate with immigration authorities.

Writing for the majority in the 2-1 ruling, Chief Judge Sidney Thomas stated: "Absent congressional authorization, the administration may not redistribute or withhold properly appropriated funds in order to effectuate its own policy goals."

Art Arthur, a resident fellow in law and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), is of the mind that the issue is one on which the Supreme Court is eventually going to have to rule.

"But in the interim, Congress needs to craft its appropriation laws more clearly in order to ensure that the Justice Department can withhold funds from states and localities not in compliance with federal laws related to immigration enforcement," he argues.

"If Congress speaks more clearly on this – and quite frankly, the courts have provided direction to them about how to do that – they should be able to give the president [and] the attorney general the authority to withhold those funds."

None of the current cases related to sanctuary policies have reached the Supreme Court.

The Trump administration says sanctuary jurisdictions allow dangerous criminals back on the street. San Francisco and other sanctuary cities say turning local police into immigration officers erodes the trust needed to get people to report crime.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Are you surprised a prominent Democrat is questioning the usefulness of the U.S. Constitution?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Democrats aren’t buying Trump’s shutdown-ending ‘compromise’
Minister says UK faces ‘political tsunami’ if Brexit halted
Vatican knew of Argentine bishop misconduct
Trump offers a ‘Dreamers’ deal for border-money proposal
Mexican pipeline explosion kills 73, leaves nightmare of ash
US spy satellite launched into orbit from California

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Pence slams BuzzFeed 'obsession,' decries 'disappointing' Pelosi rejection of Trump border funding compromise
4 border activists convicted of entering refuge, aiding illegal immigrants
Texas city officials explain why they want to remove a billboard that asks people to pray
Saudi Crown Prince shows a 'chilling' instability, Graham says
Trump: 'Things are going very well' with North Korea

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Christian businessman offers helping hand, gets sued

construction worker using a hammerThere’s a report out of Oregon about the owner of a construction company who fired an employee when he wouldn’t attend a Bible study - but it appears to be fake news.