Judge: Let's look at 'why' Trump did it

Tuesday, July 31, 2018
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

gavel brown 620x300A conservative activist and columnist says a federal judge's recent decision in a court challenge to President Donald Trump's census question regarding citizenship borders on mind-reading – not the law.

Last week, Judge Jesse M. Furman ruled that asking about citizenship on the 2020 census is legal – but also ruled the Trump administration may still have broken the law in how it went about adding that question to the new census form. Furman decided the suit brought by a coalition of Democratic attorneys general can move forward, and that the plaintiffs can try to prove that the president's team acted with "animus" toward racial or ethnic minorities in making the decision.

Robert Knight, a columnist for The Washington Times and OneNewsNow, says it's apparent this judge believes a person's motive for doing something is more important than the act itself.

"This sounds exactly like the U.S. district judges who struck down President Trump's travel ban on several terror-prone nations," he shares. "Not that he didn't have the authority to do it, but they didn't like his attitude and [his] reasons for doing so.

Robert Knight"That isn't their place [to decide that]," Knight argues. "We're getting into mind-reading, not law."

The columnist contends there's nothing wrong with asking about citizenship on the U.S. census, adding that "it seems like a perfectly appropriate place to do it."

"And [yet] there is panic among progressives," he notes. "And you have to ask why they're so concerned that it might reveal how many non-citizens there are in the United States. In fact, a Washington Post editorial says it sounds like – quote – 'an underhanded way to depress Democratic representation in Washington.'

"Are they admitting that the Democrats are depending on non-citizens to vote for them?" he wonders.

Knight adds that if that's the case, the progressives/Democrats are being "entirely hypocritical" in their continued push behind the narrative that Russia interfered with the 2016 presidential election and Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton.

"If the Democrats are so concerned about foreign intervention in America, why are they trying to get non-citizens to vote?" he asks.

Knight is encouraged that Congressman Jeff Duncan (R-South Carolina) has introduced legislation that would strip federal funding from states or localities that allow non-citizens to vote in their elections.

Comments will be temporarily unavailable. Thank you for your patience as we restore this service!

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWS BRIEF

FEATURED PODCAST

VOTE IN OUR POLL

What's the most likely outcome of President Biden's proposed spending spree?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Firing of Atlanta officer who shot Rayshard Brooks reversed
Biden administration spending billions on shelters for illegals
Facebook board upholds Trump suspension
Cheney paying price for her anti-Trump rhetoric
Nation's birth rate falls to its lowest level in 100 years

LATEST FROM THE WEB

The Derek Chauvin verdict is just the beginning
The cost of virtue signaling is getting high — and leading directly to a social credit system
Praying to God could be made a crime, lawmakers threatened with legal action
How COVID went from a virus to a partisan religion
Biden’s restaurant rescue plan blatantly discriminates against white males

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Judge: Trans surgery 'medically necessary' – and Medicaid covers the bill

surgical instruments 1A federal judge has ruled that Wisconsin has to pay for body mutilation surgery on two transgender individuals.