Union stakes are 'very, very high'

Monday, July 30, 2018
 | 
Bob Kellogg (OneNewsNow.com)

Teacher's deskA civil liberties lawyer predicts the recent Supreme Court decision prohibiting public sector unions from collecting certain fees from nonmembers could be devastating for those unions.

Following Janus vs. the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, seven California teachers have filed a class-action lawsuit to be reimbursed with the fees they never should have had to pay. Brad Dacus of the Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) says the unions have been dealt a dizzying decision.

"The stakes are very, very high," he asserts. "If the school teachers prevail, we are looking at hundreds of millions of dollars having to be reimbursed to public employees throughout 22 different states if this case goes all the way to the Supreme Court."

Dacus, Brad (PJI)Dacus tells OneNewsNow the Janus verdict is among the top ten most significant court decisions he has seen in his lifetime.

"If this case prevails, it could, theoretically, literally bankrupt public employee unions all throughout the country who will not be willing or able to come up with that much money to pay back that many union workers," the PJI president explains.

According to Education Week, education policy consultant Matt Frendeway predicts similar lawsuits will soon follow in other states.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

I agree with this HHS proposal reversing the Obamacare section benefiting transgenders primarily because …

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Missouri governor signs bill banning abortions at 8 weeks
Feds move to correct Obama's transgender healthcare policies
Trump calls for declassification of Mueller probe documents
Jury finds man guilty of murder in Tennessee church shooting
UK's May says she'll quit as Conservative leader June 7
Kenyan court upholds laws against homosexual relations

LATEST FROM THE WEB

The 4 fears used to manipulate Americans
We don't have a problem with white supremacy. We have a problem with leftist supremacy
Portland State rejects ‘Conservative Political Thought’ course because it’s not inclusive
The problem with ‘price transparency’ in prescription drugs
Feminism: False advertising at its finest

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
Judge: Trans surgery 'medically necessary' – and Medicaid covers the bill

surgical instruments 1A federal judge has ruled that Wisconsin has to pay for body mutilation surgery on two transgender individuals.