SCOTUS confirms the right to pray

Saturday, June 30, 2018
Chris Woodward (

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagJune brought plenty of big surprises from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), with a major one being the reversal of a case involving prayer.

In what came as a shock to some observers on Thursday, SCOTUS summarily reversed a lower court ruling in the lawsuit, Sause v. Bauer – a 2013 case that was originally brought to court in Louisburg, Kansas.

Stephanie Taub, an attorney serving with First Liberty Institute – the legal group that co-represented Sause – provided some details from the case.

"Two police officers came to the door of Mary Anne Sause's apartment," Taub recounted. "She's a devout Catholic, and these police officers intimidated her and harassed her and ordered her to stop praying in her own home.”

She was pleased to divulge the final outcome of the lawsuit.

“[On Thursday,] the Supreme Court ruled in her favor, holding that everyone is entitled to the constitutional right to pray," Taub announced.

An appellate court had ruled that the officers – who entered Sause's home to investigate an alleged noise complaint – were entitled to qualified immunity.

"So, we were elated that the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens like Miss Sause, and that her constitutional rights should not be ignored, because no American should be told they cannot pray in their home," Taub insisted. "This decision holds – it protects everybody's constitutional rights, and it shows that she is entitled to her day in court."

She responded with gratitude to the SCOTUS decision

"I am thankful that God provided me attorneys who fought this tremendous legal battle on my behalf," Sause expressed.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.



We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details
IL pro-lifers wait for action after NIFLA ruling

gavel brown 620x300A law in Illinois that regulates pro-life pregnancy centers remains tied up in court following a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision.