'Soft coup' from within deep state becoming more evident: Barber

Tuesday, June 12, 2018
 | 
Chad Groening (OneNewsNow.com)

Lady of JusticeA constitutional attorney isn't surprised that the Justice Department has indicted a former Senate aide for leaking classified material to the media.

A federal indictment was handed down last week against James A. Wolfe, a former Senate Intelligence Committee aide. He is accused of leaking secret and top-secret classified information to multiple media sources. Wolfe was reported to have been arraigned in federal court on Friday and turned himself into the FBI Washington field office on Monday.

The indictment states that Wolfe, 57, repeatedly lied to the FBI when he was questioned about his involvement in leaking that classified information. Investigators also secretly seized years' worth of phone and email communications of New York Times reporter Ali Watkins, with whom Wolfe reportedly had a three-year relationship.

Matt Barber, co-founder and chief counsel of Christian Civil Rights Watch, says it should be no surprise that Wolfe was indicted.

Barber, Matt (Christian Civil Rights Watch)"... He was clearly leaking evidence and is now indicted for lying to investigators. It is getting more and more interesting," he tells OneNewsNow. "[And] it's unprecedented – we've never seen this kind of soft coup attempt from within our own deep state government."

And Barber says "it remains to be seen" if federal authorities were justified in seizing the New York Times reporter's materials.

"We need more details on the government kind of grabbing all of this information from this reporter," he acknowledges. "But it may very well be in this case that it's justified – and it may be necessary in order to delve a little deeper into this conspiracy to unseat Donald Trump."

Wolfe's case is the first known instance of the Justice Department going after a reporter's data by the Trump administration.

Consider Supporting Us?

The staff at Onenewsnow.com strives daily to bring you news from a biblical perspective. If you benefit from this platform and want others to know about it please consider a generous gift today.

MAKE A DONATION

Comments

We moderate all reader comments, usually within 24 hours of posting (longer on weekends). Please limit your comment to 300 words or less and ensure it addresses the article - NOT another reader's comments. Comments that contain a link (URL), an inordinate number of words in ALL CAPS, rude remarks directed at other readers, or profanity/vulgarity will not be approved. More details

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSBRIEF

SUBSCRIBE

VOTE IN OUR POLL

Are you surprised a prominent Democrat is questioning the usefulness of the U.S. Constitution?

CAST YOUR VOTE

GET PUSH NOTIFICATIONS

SUBSCRIBE

LATEST AP HEADLINES

Trump offers a ‘Dreamers’ deal for border-money proposal
Mexican pipeline explosion kills 73, leaves nightmare of ash
US spy satellite launched into orbit from California
Trump offers immigration deal to end shutdown
Trump fires back after Mueller disputes accuracy of report
Wild week over Brexit leaves British politics in crisis mode

LATEST FROM THE WEB

Trump: 'Things are going very well' with North Korea
CNN blows gasket over Trump’s ‘inflammatory,’ ‘scare-mongering’ speech offering to compromise
Networks spend over 27 minutes on dubious BuzzFeed Trump story
Winter storm sweeping across US, with more than 100M Americans in its path
Mueller team disputes BuzzFeed report claiming Trump told Cohen to lie

CARTOON OF THE DAY

Cartoon of the Day
NEXT STORY
SCOTUS confirms the right to pray

U.S. Supreme Court w/ flagJune brought plenty of big surprises from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), with a major one being the reversal of a case involving prayer.